About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

6 Int'l Env't Agreements: Pol. L. & Econs. 1 (2006)

handle is hein.journals/intenve6 and id is 1 raw text is: International Environmental Agreements (2006) 6:1-28              © Springer 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10784-004-5645-3
Multi-Stage: A Rule-Based Evolution of Future
Commitments Under the Climate Change
Convention
MICHEL G.J. DEN ELZEN', MARCEL BERK', PAUL LUCAS',
PATRICK CRIQUI2 and ALBAN KITOUS2
\Netherlands .ational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) P.O. Box 1,
3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands (E-mail: michel.den.elzen a rivm.nl); 2Energy and
Environmental Policies (LEPI-EPE) - CNRS, BP 47, 38040 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
Accepted 29 October 2004
Abstract. This article presents the regional emission targets corresponding to different climate
regimes for differentiating commitments beyond 2012 on the basis of the Multi-Stage ap-
proach. This approach assumes a gradual increase in the number of Parties involved and their
level of commitment according to participation and differentiation rules. The analysis focuses
on two global greenhouse gas emission profiles resulting in CO2-equivalent concentrations
stabilising at 550 and 650 ppmv in 2100 and 2150, respectively. Three Multi-Stage cases have
been developed in order to assess different types of thresholds. These share three consecutive
stages representing different commitments: stage 1 - no quantitative commitments; stage 2 -
emission-limitation targets and stage 3 - emission reduction targets. The analysis shows that
by 2025 all three cases result in emission reduction objectives for all Annex I regions of at least
30-55% below their 1990 levels for 550 ppmv, whereas for 650 ppmv target they range from 0
to 20%. Furthermore, early participation is required of the major non-Annex I regions
through emission limitation targets i.e. before 2025 and 2050 for the 550 and 650 ppmv
targets, respectively. The first participation threshold for adopting emission-limitation targets
on the basis of a capability-responsibility index (as introduced here) can provide for a bal-
anced and timely participation of non-Annex I regions. Major strengths and weaknesses of the
climate regimes are discussed and important obstacles and pre-conditions for their feasibility
and acceptability are highlighted.
Key words: differentiation of future commitments, international regime, Multi-Stage, post-
Kyoto climate regime
Abbreviations: CDM - Clean Development Mechanism; CR - Capability-Respon-
sibility; GHG - Greenhouse gas; PCC - Per Capita Convergence; UNFCCC -
United Nations Frame-work Convention on Climate Change
1. Introduction
The Multi-Stage approach is one of the possible international climate regimes for
differentiating emission targets for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries beyond

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most