About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

9 Inonu U. L. Rev. 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/inonu9 and id is 1 raw text is: HUKUK USULUNE DAIR LA HAYE SOZLESMESI KAPSAMINDA YABANCI TUZEL KISILERIN TEMINAT YUKUMLULUGUNDEN MUAFIYETI EXEMPTION OF LEGAL PERSONS FROM SECURITY FOR COSTS UNDER THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL PROCEDURE DOI: 10.21492/inuhfd.358545 Emre ESEN* Ozet 1 Mart 1954 tarihli Hukuk Usulune Dair La Haye SCzlegmesi'nin 17. maddesinde, bir hkit deviette ikamet eden akit deviet vatandaylanndan, herhangi bir ilt devietin mahkemeleri huzurunda davaci veya midahil olarak bulunmalan hdlinde, yabanci olmalar veya o ulkede ikametgfh veya mesken sahibi olmamalan sebebiyle, herhangi bir teminat istenemeyecegi 6ngrtilmti~tir. Yargitay'in 2013 ve 2016 yllannda verdigi iki kararda, 1954 tarihli Sdzlegme'nin 17. maddesi gergevesinde teminat nuafiyetinden yararlanacak kigilerin vatanda$ (national) tabiriyle ifade edilni$ olmasindan ve 1954 tarihli Sdzlegme'nin yerini almasi amaclyla hazirlanan 25 Ekim 1980 tarihli Adalete Uluslararasi Eriim Hakkinda Sdzlegme'nin 14. maddesinde, 1954 tarihli Sdzlegme'den farkli olarak, tizel kigilerin teminat muafiyeti kapsaminda oldugunun alkga diizenlenmi$ olmasindan hareket edilerek; 1954 tarihli Sdzlegme'nin 17. maddesindeki teminat muafiyetinin sadece gergek kigiler igin getirilmi oldugu ve bu muafiyetten titzel kigilerin yararlanamayacagi sonucuna varlngtir. Bu galama, Yargitay'm bu kararlanndan hareketle, titzel kigilerin 1954 tarihli Sdzlegme'nin 17. maddesinde 6ngcrtilen teminat muafiyetinden yararlamp yararlanamayacagi meselesini; 1954 tarihli Sdzlegme'nin lafzi ve Ozil bakimlarndan yormnlamnasi suretiyle, 1980 tarihli SOzlegme'nin gerek metninin gerekse alklay1ci raporunu nazara alarak ve 1954 tarihli SOzlegme'ye taraf deviet mahkemelerinin yargisal iytihatlan ii$gmda ele almayi amajlamaktadir. Anahtar Kelimeler: 1954 tarihli Hukuk Usultine Dair S~zlegme, teminat, teminat nuafiveti, tfizel kigiler Abstract Article 17 of the Hague Convention of 1 March 1954 on Civil Procedure provides that no security, bond or deposit of any kind may be imposed by reason of their foreign nationality, or of lack of domicile or residence in the country, upon nationals of one of the Contracting States, having their domicile in one of these States, who are plaintiffs or parties intervening before the courts of another of those States. The Turkish Supreme Court ruled in two different decisions rendered in 2013 and in 2016 that the exemption * Dog. Dr., Istanbul Universitesi Hukuk Faktlltesi, Milletlerarasi Ozel Hukuk Anabilim Dali (emreesen@istanbul.edu.tr) Makale Gonderilme Tarihi: 28.11.2017 Makale Kabul Tarihi: 04.01.2018 Inonu Universitesi Hukuk Faklitesi Dergisi -InUHFD- Cilt:9Sayz:] Yil 2018 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most