- HeinOnline.org Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

53 Guild Prac. 207 (1996)
Micro Radio vs. the FCC: The Case of Stephen Dunifer and Free Radio Berkeley

handle is hein.journals/guild53 and id is 218 raw text is: ALAN KORN
In a special issue of The Nation dated June 3, 1996, Mark Crispin
Miller of John Hopkins University analyzes the increasing
corporatization of the United States communications and entertain-
ment media.' Criticizing what he calls the national entertainment
state, Professor Miller argues that the time has come to enforce anti-
trust laws in order to free the media from increasing monopolization.
One remedy cited by Miller is a possible class action lawsuit against
the FCC for its failure to promote the public interest. In fact, a legal
challenge is currently pending in Federal District Court that raises
many of the same arguments cited by Professor Miller.2 This land-
mark case pits Stephen Dunifer and his micro power station Free
Radio Berkeley against the FCC, which brought suit in 1994 to en-
join Dunifer's unlicensed broadcasts. At issue is whether FCC regu-
lations prohibiting FM broadcasts of less than 100 watts violate the
First and Fifth Amendments by preventing politically and economi-
cally disenfranchised groups, along with ethnic and religious minori-
ties, from gaining access to the airwaves.
What is Micro Radio?
Micro radio is a low-cost, low power method of FM broadcasting.
Micro radio stations transmit at 1 to 40 watts and have a broadcast ra-
dius of 1- 1/2 to 5 miles depending on terrain and other factors. Propo-
nents argue that micro radio is easy to operate, affordable and easily
accessible to disenfranchised groups ignored by demographic-driven,
high watt commercial and public radio. In 1978, the FCC issued a ruling
which eliminated low power FM stations from the airwaves.
Alan Korn (aakorn@igc.org) is a Guild Member and an attorney practicing
art, entertainment and media law with the Bay Area firm of Bogatin, Berchenko
& Corman. He is a member of the Steering Committee of the Lawyers Guild's
Committee on Democratic Communications, and serves as amicus counsel in
the Dunifer case on behalf of the Guild, Media Alliance and the Womens'
International News Gathering Services (WINGS).

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom