About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

20 Griffith L. Rev. 362 (2011)
Getting from 'Critic and Conscience' to Conscientious Criticism

handle is hein.journals/griffith20 and id is 368 raw text is: GETTING FROM 'CRITIC AND CONSCIENCE' TO CONSCIENTIOUS
CRITICISM
Warwick Tie*
The conditions under which practices of conscientious criticism
become available to the academic are the same conditions
under which the discourse of 'critic and conscience of society'
displays itself as being, in an ideological manner, the imaginary
relationship of the academic persona to the real conditions of
its production (Althusser 2004). To the extent that 'critic and
conscience of society' is not recognised as being an ideological
formation of this kind, the subjectivity of the academic is liable
to be scripted in accordance with various logics that originate
within the prevailing socio-political systems. In Lacanian terms,
the academic is liable to be scripted as a split subject: le sujet
suppos6 savoir (Lacan 1961). The complicity of the discourse
in this particular subjectivation of the academic becomes
evident, and the possibility of conscientious criticism emerges,
where academic knowledge production begins to operate
through practices that do not simply analyse but also enable
socio-legal criticism to continually exceed the terms of its own
analysis.
Bridging the domains of academic knowledge and academic subjectivity, the
legal discourse that establishes the New Zealand university as 'critic and
conscience of society' operates as an ideological device in the sense meant
by the US cultural Marxist Fredric Jameson. The discourse provides a
mechanism by which academics can locate themselves - can 'cognitively
map' their positions' - relative to a range of coordinates that structure the
intellectual field which employs them (including the socio-political contexts
that now frame the purposes of the university;' the state of academic
knowledge;' the vectors of contemporary intellectual agency,' and so on).
The ability of the discourse to operate continually in this facilitative
matter depends, as Michel Foucault states, upon the operation of power:
discourses circulate only to the extent to which they are propelled by social
forces outside of themselves. To reframe the point in this same Foucauldian
idiom, there exists an obdurate knowledge-power relation around which the
production of knowledge revolves. In the case of 'critic and conscience of
society', that supplementary power is legal in kind: the right of the academic
to publicly operate independently of each and every site of governance - that
Senior Lecturer, Sociology, Massey University, New Zealand.
Jameson (2000a).
2   Delanty (2001); McLennan et al (2005); Slaughter and Rhodes (2004).
Lyotard (1984); McLennan (2004).
Bauman (1987); Bourdieu and Wacquant (2001); McLennan and Osborne (2003).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most