About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

89 Geo. L.J. 797 (2000-2001)
The Human Nature of Corporate Boards: Law, Norms, and the Unintended Consequences of Independence and Accountability

handle is hein.journals/glj89 and id is 819 raw text is: ARTICLES
The Human Nature of Corporate Boards:
Law, Norms, and the Unintended Consequences
of Independence and Accountability
DONALD C. LANGEVOORT*
Studies of corporate boards of directors often observe team-like traits. Invita-
tions to the board are based heavily on matters like compatibility and fit. The
work of the board prizes consensus, not conflict.' Absent some sort of crisis,
outside members see their value largely in terms of constructive advice, giving
insiders the benefit of an expert external perspective on the company's uncertain
world.2
This portrait of cooperation is subject to two interpretations. The dominant
view in corporate governance theory today is that heavy emphasis on teamwork
and conflict-avoidance marks a board that has been captured by its CEO, an
illusion of a governing body that acts largely as an elite private club with a
rubber stamp. Much of the work in corporate governance over the last twenty-
five years in academic circles and in the lobbying efforts of shareholder activists
has been to extinguish this kind of board.3 Their goal is to replace it with the
new-style monitoring board,4 where independence, skepticism, and a rigorous
* Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. This project was supported by the George-
town-Sloan Project on Business Institutions. I am very thankful to Bill Bratton, Steve Bainbridge,
Margaret Blair, Ed Rock, Charles Elson, Mini Gulati, Randall Thomas, and participants at the
University of Michigan's Olin Law and Economics Seminar and the University of Pennsylvania
Symposium on Norms and Corporate Law for constructive comments. Suzanne Sylvester and Heather
Hathaway provided helpful research assistance.
1. See Bayless Manning, The Business Judgment Rule and the Director's Duty of Attention: Time for
Reality, 39 Bus. LAW. 1477, 1483 (1984).
2. See JAY W. LORSCH & ELIZABETH MCIVER, PAWNS OR POTENTATES: THE REALITY OF AMERICA'S
CORPORATE BOARDS 17 (1989). See generally MYLES L. MACE, DIRECTrORS: MYTH AND REALITY (2d ed.
1986).
3. See ROBERT A.G. MONKS & NELL MINOW, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 200-05 (1995); MICHAEL
USEEM, EXECUTIVE DEFENSE: SHAREHOLDER POWER AND CORPORATE REORGANIZATION 203-06 (1993);
Ronald J. Gilson & Reinier Kraakman, Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional
Investors, 43 STAN. L. REV. 863, 873 (1991); Ira M. Millstein & Paul W. MacAvoy, The Active Board of
Directors and Performance of the Large Publicly Traded Corporation, 98 COLUM. L. REv. 1283, 1285
(1998); James M. Tobin, The Squeeze on Directors Inside Is Out, 49 Bus. LAW. 1707, 1719-20 (1994);
Robert C. Pozen, Institutional Investors: The Reluctant Activists, HARV. Bus. REV., Jan.-Feb. 1994, at
140.
4. See MELVIN A. EISENBERG, THE STRUCTURE OF THE CORPORATION 140-48 (1976); Eugene F. Fama &
Michael C. Jensen, Separation of Ownership and Control, 26 J.L. & ECON. 301, 313-15 (1983). This
idea is now expressly embodied in the American Law Institute's Principles of Corporate Governance.
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, PRINCIPLES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE § 3.01 (1994).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most