About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

100 Geo. L.J. 53 (2011-2012)
Minimalism and Experimentalism in the Administrative State

handle is hein.journals/glj100 and id is 55 raw text is: Minimalism and Experimentalism in the Administrative State CHARLES F. SABEL & WILLIAM H. SIMON* This Article identifies and appraises the two most promising alternatives to the command-and-control style of public administration that was dominant from the New Deal to the 1980s but is now in disfavor The first-minimalism- emphasizes public interventions that incorporate market concepts and practices while also centralizing and minimizing administrative discretion. The second- experimentalism-emphasizes interventions in which the central government affords broad discretion to local administrative units but measures and assesses their performance in ways designed to induce continuous learning and revision of standards. Minimalism has been prominent in legal scholarship and in the policy discourse of recent presidential administrations, but its practical impact has been surprisingly limited. By contrast, experimentalism, which has had a lower profile in academic and public discussion, has visibly influenced a broad range of critical policy initiatives in the United States and abroad. Indeed, key initiatives of the Obama Administration, including the Food Safety Moderniza- tion Act and the Race to the Top education program, are virtually unintelligible from any other perspective. We argue that, in practice, minimalism suffers from an excessive preoccupation with static efficiency norms and price signals, and from insufficient attention to learning and weak signals of risk and opportu- nity. Experimentalist intervention is a more promising approach in the growing realm of policy challenges characterized by uncertainty about both the defini- tion of the relevant problems and the solutions. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................... 54 I. MINIMALISM AND ITS LIMITS ................................. 56 A. GENERAL THEMES ................................. 57 B. LIMITATIONS: REGULATION ................................ 60 1. The Efficiency Perspective .......................... 60 2. Minimalist Intervention ............................. 64 a. Cost-Benefit Analysis ...................... 64 b. Cap-and-Trade ........................... 65 * Maurice T. Moore Professor of Law and Arthur Levitt Professor of Law, respectively, Columbia University. © 2011, Charles F Sabel & William H. Simon. We are grateful for advice and encourage- ment to Bruce Ackerman, Lewis Grossman, James Liebman, Jerry Mashaw, and Daniel Richman.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most