About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

7 German L.J. 1103 (2006)
A Response

handle is hein.journals/germlajo2006 and id is 1231 raw text is: A Response By Martti Koskenniemi* From the preceding essays, but also from the general discussion around From Apology, two themes emerge as a constant source of puzzlement, not least to myself. How does the argument in that book affect - if at all - the way we do international law? And what does the claim to be critical really mean? These are, I suppose, aspects of one larger set of problems that permeate the whole of that work. Oh yes, it does describe the argumentative patterns pretty well. But it does not really change anything, does it? One might approach this sort of query in different ways. It might be thought of as an expression of the classical theme about the relations of theory and practice in the social sciences. How do academic works influence the social world to which they are addressed? Or one might be more interested in the specific relationship between (academic) doctrines and legal practice - the outside and the inside of the legal profession. I tend to think that, overall, the most promising responses to such queries come from some sort of Marxism and that any plausible view ought to recognise the reflexivity of theory and practice - the way the two co-construct each other. One must also be aware of the stakes that affect, at each level, the choice of alternative (theoretical or practical) orientations - that is to say, the role played by power in academic institutions and the contexts of legal practice. Then there is the analytically different set of questions about how all of this is translated into the distribution of costs and benefits between human groups. The latter problem is particularly difficult in international law owing to the great distance between academia, practice and the lives of men and women that are implicated in the issues lawyers seek to deal with. As David Kennedy writes in his contribution, much could be done to clarify all of this. But I cannot even begin to undertake it here. Instead, I shall just very briefly touch upon the question of change in international law as it relates to the kind of structuralist or deconstructive enquiry performed in From Apology and in other works of that kind. martti.koskenniemi@helsinki.fi.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most