- HeinOnline.org Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

10 First Amend. L. Rev. 125 (2011-2012)
Pearson v. Callahan and Qualified Immunity: Impact on First Amendment Law

handle is hein.journals/falr10 and id is 127 raw text is: PEARSON v. CALLAHAN AND QUALIFIED
IMMUNITY: IMPACT ON FIRST AMENDMENT
LAW
BY DAVID L. HUDSON, JR.
INTRODUCTION
At first glance, a search and seizure case involving informants,
the consent-once-removed doctrine,' and other Fourth Amendment
concepts would seemingly have little connection to freedom of
expression.2 Commentators have noted, however, that, despite the case's
scant media coverage,3 the United States Supreme Court's 2008 decision
in Pearson v. Callahan4 has had a substantial impact on First
Amendment litigation.
The Court's decision in Pearson dealt with qualified immunity-
a doctrine that enables government officials to avoid liability if they have
not violated clearly established constitutional or statutory law.' The case
. David L. Hudson, Jr. serves as a First Amendment Scholar for the First
Amendment Center (http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org). He also teaches First
Amendment classes at Vanderbilt Law School and the Nashville School of Law.
1. The consent-once-removed doctrine means that a suspect or defendant can
give consent even though he does not directly give consent to the police. Under this
theory, the suspect gives consent when he allows an individual, such as an
informant, to enter his home. The consent given to the informant is then transmuted
to the police.
2. David L. Hudson, Jr., 4th Amendment Ruling Could Influence First
Amendment Law, FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER ONLINE (Jan. 27, 2009),
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/4th-amendment-ruling-could-influence-first-
amendment-law.
3. Michelle Friedland et. al., A Shift in Constitutional Tort Jurisprudence, SAN
FRANCISCO ATT'Y: SUPREME COURT WATCH (The Bar Ass'n of San Francisco, San
Francisco, CA) (Summer, 2009), http://www.sfbar.org/forms/sfam/q22009/supreme
court-watch q2_09.pdf.
4. 555 U.S. 223 (2009).
5. Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982).

Already a Subscriber?


What Is HeinOnline?


HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom