About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

9 Eur. Competition J. 1 (2013)

handle is hein.journals/eurcompet9 and id is 1 raw text is: DOI: 10.5235/17441056.9.1.1 ABUSE OF DOMINANCE IN TECHNOLOGY- ENABLED MARKETS: ESTABLISHED STANDARDS RECONSIDERED? MIGUEL RATO AND NICOLAS PETIT* A. INTRODUCTION This paper seeks to examine whether the legal standards underpinning the application of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) need to be revisited in light of the alleged specificities of tech- nology-enabled markets. To this end, the paper is divided into seven parts. Following this short introduction (A), the paper offers first a definition of the very notion of technology-enabled markets (B). It then questions whether competition agencies should depart from conventional enforcement techniques when reviewing conduct in fast-moving, technology-enabled markets, and follow new, expedited enforcement procedures as proposed recently by several high- ranking officials (C). After this, the paper turns to substantive issues. It begins by reviewing the intricacies of market definition and dominance in technology- enabled markets (D). It then offers some general thoughts on whether a new, general legal standard for the determination of unlawful abuse is needed in technology-enabled markets (E). Finally, the paper considers six categories of abusive conduct in the high-tech sector and shows that, faced with a variety of applicable legal standards for each of them, competition agencies, courts and plaintiffs have-understandably-almost always invoked and applied the loosest possible test in support of their allegations or findings. We suggest, in turn, that under existing case law stricter standards could and should be applied, and that this is particularly important in the context of technology-enabled markets for the simple reason that it is in these markets that the most common pitfalls and shortcomings of the EU law on abuse of a dominant position are magnified (F). * Migucl Rato is Partncr with Shearman & Sterling LIP, Brussels. Nicolas Pctit is Profcssor of Law at the University of Lige and Director of the Global Competition Law Centre of the College of Europc (GCLC). The authors arc gratcful to Norman Ncyrinck and Collette Rawnsley for their useful comments on a previous version of the paper. All URLs were last accessed on 15 March 2013. April 2013 European Competiton f-ournal 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most