About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 Election L.J. 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/enlwjr17 and id is 1 raw text is: Original Articles

ELECTION LAW JOURNAL
Volume 17, Number 1, 2018
© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
DOI: 10.1089/elj.2016.0392

Considering the Prospects for Establishing
a Packing Gerrymandering Standard
Robin E. Best, Shawn J. Donahue, Jonathan Krasno, Daniel B. Magleby, and Michael D. McDonald
ABSTRACT
Courts have found it difficult to evaluate whether redistricting authorities have engaged in constitutionally
impermissible partisan gerrymandering. The knotty problem is that no proposed standard has found accep-
tance as a convincing means for identifying whether a districting plan is a partisan gerrymander with know-
able unconstitutional effects. We review five proposed standards for curbing gerrymandering. We take as
our perspective how easily manageable and effective each would be to apply at the time a redistricting au-
thority decides where to draw the lines or, post hoc, when a court is asked to decide whether an unconsti-
tutional gerrymander has been enacted. We conclude that, among the five proposals, an equal vote weight
standard offers the best prospects for identifying the form of unconstitutional gerrymanders that all but en-
sure one party is relegated to perpetual minority status.
Keywords: gerrymander, vote dilution, efficiency gap, partisan symmetry

P ARTISAN GERRYMANDERING HAS BECOME such
a dark art that retired Justice John Paul Stevens
proposed a constitutional amendment to curb it
(Stevens 2014). After the 2000 round of redistrict-
ing, David Mayhew pointed to five cases of deft
gerrymandering-Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Penn-
sylvania, and Texas (Mayhew 2011, 24; see also
Toobin 2003), to which three others could have
been added-California, Illinois, and South Caro-
lina (McDonald and Best 2015, 321). After the
2012 round of redistricting, credible gerrymander-
ing allegations have been leveled at no fewer than
ten states: Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana,
Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Robin E. Best is an associate professor of Political Science at
Binghamton University in Binghamton, New York. Shawn J.
Donahue is a JD and PhD candidate in Political Science at
Binghamton University. Jonathan Krasno is an associate profes-
sor of Political Science at Binghamton University. Daniel B.
Magleby is an assistant professor of Political Science at Bing-
hamton University. Michael D. McDonald is a professor of
Political Science at Binghamton University.

Tennessee, and Texas (Fang 2014). One could likely
add Michigan and Wisconsin without any stretch of
credibility. In all these cases the party in power is
suspected of designing districts to perpetuate their
majority control of a congressional delegation or
state legislative chamber almost regardless of what a
majority of voters would decide were they not pre-
organized in clusters favoring the party in power.
The artistry, of this sordid sort, is accomplished
through so-called packing gerrymanders. Very many
partisans of one stripe are crammed into a small num-
ber of districts while partisans of the other stripe are
given strong but not overwhelming majorities in the
larger number of remaining districts.
Justice Stevens' call for a constitutional amend-
ment comes in the face of two frustrations. Only a
few states have shown a willingness to police par-
tisan gerrymandering on their own, and courts have
been unable to craft a diagnostic standard that
identifies whether a districting plan produces consti-
tutional harm. Needless to say, the wait for a consti-
tutional amendment requires as much patience as
the wait for states to adopt rules themselves. Instead

1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most