About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

15 Elon L. Rev. 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/elonlr15 and id is 1 raw text is: 









                             ARTICLES




      NONDELEGATION AND JUDICIAL AGGRANDIZEMENT



                           ALLEN  C  SUMRALL*


      Opponents  of  the administrative state have  chosen  doctrine, not
legislation, as their preferred tool to restructure administrative govern-
ance  in the  United  States. As a result, courts may  soon  decide  that
the  nondelegation  doctrine is insufficiently robust. While the  justifi-
cation  for giving  teeth to the  nondelegation  doctrine  typically rests
on  trying  to  democratize  the  administrative state or  to encourage
Congress   to speak  more   precisely creating  a  robust  nondelegation
doctrine  would, however,   only empower the courts at Congress's ex-
pense. This Article argues that making  a  robust nondelegation doctrine
would   be an  example  of judicial self-aggrandizement. To explain why
the  Supreme   Court   would       only  be empowering itself this Article
describes judicial aggrandizement  and argues  that it is best understood
as  a  type of  institutional change  motivated  by  ideas. Drawing   on
original research  on  William Howard Taft and his decision in J.W.
Hampton,   Jr., &  Co. v. United  States, this Article demonstrates  that
ideas about  judicial empowerment   structured  the initial shifts from a
separation-of-powers  system  into a separation-of-powers  doctrine that
courts must   enforce. Taft  successfully used Supreme   Court  decisions
to aggrandize  the  Supreme  Court  and  the judiciary as  a whole.  The
same  ideas continue  to structure the courts' role in the constitutional
system.  Creating a  robust  nondelegation  doctrine requires  endorsing


* Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin; J.D., University
of Texas School of Law. The author would like to thank Josh Chafetz, Thomas Bell, Jeff
Tulis, HW Perry, Jr., Dan Brinks, Jordan Carr Peterson, Pat Sobkowski, Beau Baumann,
John Dearborn, Calvin TerBeek, Chris Wlezien, Tara Ginanne, Gary Jacobsohn, Kevin
Burns, and Justin Crowe.


(1)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most