About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

48 Duq. L. Rev. 145 (2010)
Aggravated Identity Theft is Only Punishable under Federal Statute if the Accused Knew That the Identification Information He Employed Actually Belonged to Another Individual: Flores-Figueroa v. United States

handle is hein.journals/duqu48 and id is 147 raw text is: Aggravated Identity Theft is Only Punishable
Under Federal Statute if the Accused Knew that the
Identification Information he Employed Actually
Belonged to Another Individual: Flores-Figueroa v.
United States
UNITED STATES-AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT-STATUTORY
CONSTRUCTION-KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT-The United States
Supreme Court held that for a defendant to receive an additional
two-year prison sentence under the federal aggravated identity
theft statute, the government must prove that the defendant knew
that the identification information he used actually belonged to
another individual.
Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 1886 (2009).
1.    THE FACTS OF FL ORES...................................... 146
HI.   THE PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF FL ORES................. 146
III. FL ORES AT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES................................................ 148
A.    Issue on Certiorari................................. 148
B.    Justice Breyer's Majority Opinion.............. 148
C.    Justice Scalia's Concurrence.................... 152
D.    Justice Alito's Concurrence...................... 153
IV.   THE CIRCUIT-SPLIT OVER THE KNOWLEDGE
REQUIREMENT PRIOR To FL ORES......................... 154
A.     The Fourth Circuit: Crounsset................. 155
B.     The Ninth Circuit: Beachem.................... 155
C.    The Fourth Circuit: Montejo.................... 156
D.     The Eleventh Circuit: Hurtado................. 157
E.     The Eighth Circuit: Intra-District Conflict..158
F     The First Circuit: Estrada-Sanchez ........... 161
G.    The First Circuit Reverses Estrada ............ 163
H.     The Ninth Circuit: Miranda-Lopez............ 163
V.    THE IMPACT OF FLORES AND THE FUTURE ............. 165
A.     Successful Statutory Interpretation ............ 166
B.    Public Policy Success ............................ 167
VI.    CONCLUSION ................................................... 170

145

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most