About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Duke F. L. & Soc. Change 1 (2009)

handle is hein.journals/dukef1 and id is 1 raw text is: DESEGREGATION LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
ESSAY
WENDY B. SCOTTt
I. THE ORIGINAL DEBATE: DOES DESEGREGATION REQUIRE INTEGRATION? ............. 2
II. EQUALITY RATIONALES FOR DESEGREGATION ...................................................... 4
A . D eferential Equality  ...................................................................................  4
B. Form al Equality  ..........................................................................................   6
B. Substantive  Equality  ...................................................................................  9
C. Retreat from Substantive Equality ........................................................ 10
D. Substantive Equality and Diversity ........................................................ 14
III.AN TI-SUBORDIN     ATION   .................................................................................. 15
C O N C LU SIO N   .................................................................................................................... 17
In the inaugural issue of the Duke Forum for Law & Social Change (the
Forum), the founders chose to pursue the question: How Do We Move
Education Forward? The panel presentations at the Spring Conference and the
articles in the inaugural publication address the question from two distinct
vantage points. First, the Forum asked panelists to tackle the question, Does
Integration Still Matter? At a time when some would contend that we are living
in a post-racial America -following the election of Barack Obama, the first black
President of the     United   States-the    Forum   members demonstrated         their
understanding that a proactive challenge to the entrenched structural inequality
in our public education system remains vitally important to the future of public
education.1 The Forum's Spring Conference stimulated probing discussion about
t Wendy B. Scott, Professor of Law, North Carolina Central University School of Law; B.A.
Harvard University and J.D. NYU School of Law. Professor Scott has written, lectured and consulted
extensively on issues surrounding school desegregation. She extends thanks to her colleagues at
North Carolina Central and those in attendance at the Mid-Atlantic People of Color Conference 2009,
for their invaluable comments. The research support provided by Susan McCarty of the University of
Maryland School of Law library staff and Research Assistants, MyEsha Craddock and Jennifer
Shahabuddin is deeply appreciated. Special thanks to Professors Paulette Caldwell, Muriel Morrison,
Cassandra Havard, Rachal Moran for offering in-depth comments, and symposium co-panelist
Olatunde Johnson and Kristi Bowman for introducing a new generation of ideas into the
conversation on equal education opportunity for all children.
1. Scholars periodically query the relevance of desegregation remedies as we move further
forward from the days of de jure segregation and society becomes more diverse and integrated. See,
e.g., Wendy Parker, The Future of School Desegregation, 94 Nw. U. L. REV. 1157 (2000) (proposing ways

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most