About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

6 Dalhousie L.J. 523 (1980-1981)
The Michelin Amendment in Context

handle is hein.journals/dalholwj6 and id is 529 raw text is: Brian Langille* The Michelin Amendment In Context On Friday, December 28, 1979 an Act to Amend Chapter 19 of the Nova Scotia Acts of 1972, The Trade Union Act, received Royal assent. This piece of legislation is commonly (and much more conveniently) referred to as the Michelin Bill, the Michelin Act or the Michelin Amendment.' Its namesake is Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, the Canadian subsidiary of the large French multinational radial tire manufacturer. It must, and indeed it should, seem odd that a bill amending in general terms an act of general application (the Trade Union Act of Nova Scotia)2 should bear the name of a manufacturing company located in the province. But as seems to be admitted by all concerned, there is a direct link between Michelin and the amendment. Because the link has been openly admitted or alluded to by the government which passed the amendment, much of what is contained in this comment is not new or at all extraordinary. Also, because it seems generally conceded that the handle The Michelin Amendment fits, in large measure the issues surrounding the Michelin Amendment are not labour law issues at all. The central issue is one of fundamental economic, philosophical, and political principle. To put it simply, the amendment has a great deal to do with the basic political dilemma of trading fundamental, and in a sense intangible, rights or freedoms for economic gains or increases in the general economic welfare of an economically depressed area. This is so much more important a question than any problem of tinkering with technical labour law concepts such as appropriate bargaining units and community of interest that it overwhelms any attempted labour law analysis. So, what reasons are there for wishing to discuss the Michelin Amendment in labour law terms? First, there was an attempt to justify the amendment in labour law terms - the term broad based *Assistant Professor of Law, Dalhousie Law School. B.A., LL.B., B.C.L. (Oxon). This paper was prepared for and presented in abbreviated form to the annual meeting of the Canadian Industrial Relations Association at Montreal on June 2, 1980. I wish to thank my colleagues, Innis Christie and Larry Steinberg, for their comments. 1. The text of the legislation is set out in Appendix A. 2. S.N.S. 1972, c. 19 as amended by S.N.S. 1977, c. 70 and S.N.S. 1978, c. 34.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most