About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

68 Crime L. & Soc. Change 1 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/crmlsc68 and id is 1 raw text is: Crime Law Soc Change (2017) 68:1-15                                    CrossMark
DOI 10.1007/s10611-016-9678-7
Policing, crime and 'big data'; towards a critique
of the moral economy of stochastic governance
Carrie B. Sanders' - James Sheptycki2
Published online: 3 January 2017
O The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract The paper defines 'stochastic governance' as the governance of populations
and territory by reference to the statistical representations of metadata. Stochastic
governance aims at achieving social order through algorithmic calculation made
actionable through policing and regulatory means. Stochastic governance aims to
improve the efficiency and sustainability of populations and territory while reducing
costs and resource consumption. The algorithmic administration of populations and
territory has recourse to 'Big Data'. The big claim of Big Data is that it will revolu-
tionize the governance of big cities and that, since stochastic governance is data driven,
evidence-led and algorithmically analysed, it is based on morally neutral technology.
The paper defines moral economy - understood to be the production, distribution,
circulation and use of moral sentiments emotions and values, norms and obligations in
social space - through which it advances a contribution to the critique of stochastic
governance. In essence the argument is that certain technological developments in
relation to policing, regulation, law and governance are taking place in the context of a
neo-liberal moral economy that is shaping the social outcomes of stochastic gover-
nance. Thinking about policing in both the narrow sense of crime fighting and more
broadly in its Foucaldian sense as governance, empirical manifestations of 'policing
with Big Data' exhibit the hallmarks of the moral economy of neo-liberalism. This
suggests that a hardening of the socio-legal and technical structures of stochastic
governance has already largely taken place.
James Sheptycki contributions to this paper are based on research undertaken while holding SSHRC Insight
Grant No. 435-2013-1283.
W James Sheptycki
jshep@yorku.ca
Carrie B. Sanders
csanders@wlu.ca
Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, ON, Canada
2  York University, Toronto M3J 1P3, Canada

4_ Springer

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most