About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2 Crime Sci. 1 (2013)

handle is hein.journals/crimsci2 and id is 1 raw text is: Ash by and Bowers Crime Science 2013,2:1
http://www.crimesciencejournaI.com/content/2/1/1

Crime Science

A comparison of methods for temporal
analysis of aoristic crime
Matthew PJ Ashby * and Kate J Bowers2
Abstract
Objectives: To test the accuracy of various methods previously proposed (and one new method) to estimate offence
times where the actual time of the event is not known.
Methods: For 303 thefts of pedal cycles from railway stations, the actual offence time was determined from
closed-circuit television and the resulting temporal distribution compared against commonly-used estimated
distributions using circular statistics and analysis of residuals.
Results: Aoristic analysis and allocation of a random time to each offence allow accurate estimation of peak offence
times. Commonly-used deterministic methods were found to be inaccurate and to produce misleading results.
Conclusions: It is important that analysts use the most accurate methods for temporal distribution approximation to
ensure any resource decisions made on the basis of peak times are reliable.
Keywords: Temporal crime analysis, Aoristic analysis, Temporal accuracy, Peak offence times

Background
The routine activities approach to explaining crime pat-
terns, first articulated by Cohen and Felson (1979, 590),
describes how variations in the availability of offenders,
targets and guardians explain spatio-temporal variations
in crime. When and where there are more offenders, more
targets and fewer guardians, there is likely to be more
crime (Brantingham and Brantingham 1993, 6). The pur-
pose of this article is to further efforts to analyse these
variations by assessing the accuracy of different methods
for estimating the most common offence times for certain
types of crime for which individual offence times are not
known.
Academic interest in developing crime-analysis tech-
niques has focused on spatial variation in crime (Ratcliffe
and McCullagh 1998, 752), with less attention being paid
to temporal variation. This does not mean that tempo-
ral variation is not important: Felson (2006, 7) described
crime as being in motion-daily, hourly, and momentar-
ily, on large scale and small'; while Felson and Poulsen
*Correspondence: matthew.ashby.09@ucl.ac.uk
1 UcL Security Science Doctoral Research Training Centre, 35 Tavistock Square,
London WCl H 9EZ, UK
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

SSpringer

(2003, 595) noted that the frequency of crime varies more
throughout each day than in any other way.
Previous research has shown that the routine activi-
ties approach can explain temporal variations in the fre-
quency of many crimes. Temporal variation in crime can
be explored on many scales-weekly, monthly and yearly
(e.g. Baumer and Wright 1996)-but we focus on varia-
tion across the day as our scale of interest here. Melbin
(1978, 453) noted that the rhythms of crime in Boston
followed, but lagged behind, the pattern of routine activ-
ities. Cohn (1993, 76) found that day of the week, time
of day, school vacations and public holidays-which influ-
ence people's activities-all predicted the frequency of
police calls to deal with domestic violence. Messner and
Tardiff (1985, 258) found that homicides in which the vic-
tim and offender were related to one another were more
common at weekends, when people spend more time with
family and friends. Cohn and Rotton (2003, 356) took this
idea further and demonstrated that the frequency and dis-
tribution of many types of crime vary substantially on
major public holidays, when both offenders and victims
are engaged in activities that are different from activities
on 'normal' days. These studies all indicate that temporal
variation in crime is both substantial and associated with
the routine activities of both victims and offenders.

© 2013 Ashby and Bowers; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most