About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

4 Const. Pol. Econ. 1 (1993)

handle is hein.journals/constpe4 and id is 1 raw text is: CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, VOL. 4. NO. 1, 1993
HOW CAN CONSTITUTIONS BE DESIGNED SO THAT
POLITICIANS WHO SEEK TO SERVE PUBLIC
INTEREST CAN SURVIVE AND PROSPER?*
James M. Buchanan**
Distributional politics in modern democracy involves the exploitation of minorities by
majorities. and as persons rotate membership, all parties in the game lose. This
result emerges only because differences in treatment are permissible. If the principle of
generality (analogous to that present in an idealized version of the rule of law) could,
somehow, be introduced into politics, mutual exploitation could be avoided. The analysis
offers support for such policies as (I) flat-rate taxes, (2) equal per head transfers or
demogrants and (3) uniform regulation of all industries.
In a short paper, Public Choice after Socialism (1992), I argued
that the structure of modern democratic politics is such that the play-
ers, the participants in the distributional game among competing con-
stituency agents, are effectively forced to behave as if they are exclu-
sively motivated by narrowly defined or differential special interests.
Political players who might seek to further some conception of an all-
encompassing general, or public, interest cannot survive. They tend to
be eliminated from the political game in the evolution-like selection
process.
In this note, I want to extend this argument further by asking the
question: How could the structure (constitution) of modern politics be
changed so that it would allow players who might try to further a more
encompassing interest to survive and prosper? Or, in other terms, how
could the constitutional framework be reformed so that players who
advance generalized interests are rewarded rather than punished. As
indicated in the other paper, the response is clear. The distributional
elements in the inclusive political game must be eliminated, or at least
very substantially reduced. But I want here, to the extent possible, to
*The argument here was initially presented as a Liberty Fund Conference talk in July
1992 under the title Political Ethics as a Criterion for Constitutional Design. I am
indebted to my colleagues Viktor Vanberg, and especially Hartmut Kliemt for helpful
comments on an earlier draft.
**Advisory General Director and Harris Professor, George Mason University, Fairfax,
VA 22030.

1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most