About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

39 Conn. L. Rev. CONNtemplations 1 (2007)

handle is hein.journals/conntemp39 and id is 1 raw text is: CONNECTICUT
LAW REVIEW
VOLUME 39        CONNtemplations                          SPRING 2007
Essay
The Law Reviews vs. the Courts:
Two Thoughts From the Ivory Tower
STEPHEN I. VLADECK
1. INTRODUCTION
If you're reading this, you must not be a federal judge.
According to a March 2007 article in the New York Times, legal
scholarship has become too ethereal and abstract to be of any practical use
to federal judges in their everyday disposition of cases.' In the words of
Dennis G. Jacobs, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, I haven't opened up a law review in years.... No one speaks of
them. No one relies on them.2 Paraphrasing 19th century Scottish writer
Andrew Lang, Second Circuit Judge Robert Sack went even further,
suggesting that, even when judges do cite law review articles today, they
use them  like drunks use lampposts, i.e., more for support than for
illumination.
This accusation is nothing new. For almost as long as legal scholarship
has been around, there have been questions as to its relevance to everyday
practitioners, including the bench and the bar.4 Perhaps the most famous
. Associate Professor, University of Miami School of Law; Associate Professor (as of Fall 2007),
American University Washington College of Law. My thanks to Matt Bodie, Duncan Hollis, and Paul
Horwitz, for helpful conversations and camaraderie.
Adam Liptak, When Rendering Decisions, Judges Are Finding Law Reviews Irrelevant, N.Y.
TIMES, Mar. 19, 2007, at A8, available at LEXIS, News Library, NYT File.
2 id.
Id.
4 See, e.g., Fred Rodell, Goodbye to Law Reviews, 23 VA. L. REV. 38 (1936). As Rodell
suggested, [t]here are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its
content. Id. at 38. It is also nothing new to suggest that this problem is particularly acute in the courts

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most