About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2005 Cal. Sup. Ct. Hist. Soc'y Newsl. 1 (2005)

handle is hein.journals/casrecths2005 and id is 1 raw text is: 



     itliA SUApF




${                           THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT



                      1 HistoricalSociety

                                               NEWSLETTER - SPRING/SUMMER 2005


       A  History  of the Court of Appeal
         for the First Appellate District
         BY HON.  JAMES  J. MARCHIANO


Adopting the motto Striving for Justice Yesterday, Today,
and Tomorrow: 1905 to 2005, the California Court of
Appeal begins a celebration of its one-hundredth anniver-
sary this year. This article, featuring the First Appellate
District, inaugurates a series, continuing in future
CSCHS   Newsletter issues, that will include histories of
each of the six districts of the Court ofAppeal.
    The California court system first gained an inter-
mediate Court of Appeal in 1905. Twenty years earlier,
due to a backlog of cases confronting the Supreme
Court, the legislature authorized the Court to appoint
three commissioners to assist the justices in resolving
appeals. In 1889 the number was increased to five.
    A commissioner  authored an opinion, joined by
two other commissioners. Three Supreme Court jus-
tices reviewed the opinion and then formally adopted
it, affirming or reversing the judgment as indicated.
The California Reports for this era reflect the name of
the authoring commissioner  and the names  of the
approving justices. But members of the Bar complained
that shadow commissioners rather than elected justices
were doing the Court's appellate work.
    Finally, with the number of undecided cases con-
tinuing to increase, on March 14, 1903, the legislature
approved a constitutional amendment creating three
intermediate courts of appeal and abolishing the com-
mission. The amendment   provided for the appoint-
ment  of justices and their subsequent election, and
authorized the transfer of cases to the new tribunals
and review of their decisions by the Supreme Court.
Voters approved the amendment  in the general elec-
tion of November 1904. The legislature set the justices'
annual pay at $7,000, a good salary in 1905.
    Governor George Pardee appointed a total of nine
justices to serve in the First District in San Francisco,
the Second  District in Los Angeles, and the Third


                        District in Sacramento.
                        The new  justices included
                        the five commissioners in
                        office at the time. In the
                        First Appellate District, the
                        court consisted of Ralph C.
                        Harrison and James Coop-
                        er, both former commis-
                        sioners, along with Samuel
                        Hall, who  was  elevated
                        from the Superior Court of
 r                   -  Alameda.On  May 22, 1905,
 Justice Harrison, early 1900s the First District became
                        the first appellate court to
decide a case, People v. Curtis, 1 Cal.App. 1 (1905).
    Ralph Harrison served as the District's first presid-
ing justice. A prominent San Francisco lawyer, he had
been elected in 1890  to a twelve-year term as an
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Thereafter he
was appointed as a Supreme Court commissioner until
his appointment to the First District Court of Appeal.
His opinions were noted for their crystalline clear-
ness, according to a contemporary commentator.
    Under the constitutional amendment,  the new
appointees subsequently sat for election in 1906. This
circumstance resulted in a personnel change for the
First District. Presiding Justice Ralph Harrison de-
served to be nominated, but the Republican conven-
tion, dominated by San Francisco Boss Abe Ruef,
selected San Francisco Board of Supervisor James
Gallagher to run instead. The voters elected James A.
Cooper,  the Democratic  candidate,  as Presiding
Justice, along with Samuel  P. Hall and Frank H.
Kerrigan as Associate Justices.
    Justice Harrison then retired to private law prac-
tice with his sons in San Francisco. He lost his elegant
home  in the 1906 San Francisco fire and later with his
wife donated their considerable book collection to
Carmel  where  the Ralph Harrison  Public Library
stands as a memorial to him.
    The constitutional amendment also required each
justice to select his term by lot so that the terms were


NEWSLET TER - SPRIN(./SUMNIER 2005


r

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most