About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

96 Can. B. Rev. 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/canbarev96 and id is 1 raw text is: VoL. 96 2018 No. 1 OBSTACLES TO CROSSING THE DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLD: CONNECTING INDIVIDUAL EXCLUSION TO GROUP-BASED INEQUALITIES Colleen Sheppard* & Mary Louise Chabot** In two important unanimous judgments, Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v Bombardier Inc (Bombardier Aerospace Training Centre) and Kahkewistahaw First Nation v Taypotat, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that there was insufficient evidence of discrimination. Consequently, it dismissed both claims without requiring that the defendants justify the allegedly exclusionary criteria being challenged. While these cases arose in very different factual and legal contexts, there are troubling common threads that tie them together. Most poignantly, in both cases, the plaintiffs do not succeed in proving what is often referred to as aprima facie case of discrimination, and the predominant justification for this failure is the inadequacy of the evidence. These cases, therefore, provide an important starting point for thinking about how to prove discrimination. They raise questions regarding the use of the terminology 'rimafacie discrimination the role offactual inferences in statutory or constitutional discrimination analysis and the significance of broader evidence about social context in individual discrimination cases. Finally, they remind us that how plaintiffs lose matters. The fact that the Court did not get beyond the preliminary finding of prima facie discrimination stands in stark contrast to many anti-discrimination cases where the heart of the dispute revolves around the adequacy of the justification for the challenged exclusionary criteria. Professor, Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, Faculty of Law, McGill University. I wish to acknowledge research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. .. BCL/LLB, Faculty of Law, McGill University, 2017. THE CANADIAN BAR REVIEW LA REVUE DU BARREAU CANADIEN

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most