About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

5 Cambridge J. Int'l & Comp. L. 337 (2016)
Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in European Union Law: Considering the Existence of Substantive Constraints on Treaty Revision

handle is hein.journals/cajoincla5 and id is 349 raw text is: 

                                                        D1:10.7574!      002.337
                                                                        @Authors



 Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in

 European Union Law: Considering the Existence

 of  Substantive Constraints on Treaty Revision


 Reijer Passchier*  and  Maarten Stremler


 Abstract

 The issue of unconstitutional constitutional amendments is extremely topical in the field of
 national and comparative constitutional law. In a recent article (2013), Roznai signals that
'the global trend is moving towards accepting the idea of limitations-explicit or implicit-
on constitutional amendment power. But what about the 'supranational' EU? Would there be
room  to argue that substantive limitations of amendability-explicit or implicit-also exist as
regards the EU Treaties? Furthermore, if so, would the Court of Justice of the European Union
(CJEU)  have the competence to enforce such limits? These questions are the central focus of
this article. We argue that accepting the idea of substantive requirements of Treaty revision
may  be one of the next important steps in the ongoing process of EU constitutionalisation.
In the first part of the article, we explore what kind of arguments are being used to justify
a doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendments in national systems. Next, we
ascertain to what extent such arguments can be used to justify a doctrine of unconstitutional
constitutional amendment in EU law. In conclusion, we argue that it is quite conceivable that
certain EU Treaty amendments  would indeed be deemed  to be a violation of the Treaties.
Moreover, we contend that it is not unimaginable that the CJEU will assume the power to
substantively review amendments to the EU Treaties, in cases where the Member States would
choose to put forth suspect revisions to these documents.


Keywords

Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments, European Union, Treaty revision




*    PhD Researcher and Junior Lecturer at the Department of Constitutional and Administrative
     Law, Leiden Law School (The Netherlands).
 *   PhD Researcher and Junior Lecturer at the Department of Public Law, Jurisprudence and Legal
     History, Tilburg Law School (The Netherlands).
     We are grateful for helpful comments provided by Richard Albert, Christina Fasone, Guiseppe
     Martinico, Irene Pellizzone, Robert Schiltze, and the other participants at the Workshop in
     Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Milan and the Durham-Cambridge Workshop
     in EU Law. We also thank the two anonymous peer reviewers for their constructive comments.


2OI6~ Vl 5 I~     bdge journal of Iternational and Comparative Law  3


2016) Vol 5 1!


;37

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most