About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

13 J. Bus. & Sec. L. 201 (2012-2013)
Antitrust Class Action Litigation Post Wal-Mart v. Dukes: More of the Same

handle is hein.journals/bussecul13 and id is 209 raw text is: ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION LITIGATION POST
WAL-MART V. DUKES: MORE OF THE SAME
Amit Bindra
I. CLASS ACTION ANTITRUST LITIGATION IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE
PUBLIC.        ................................................ 202
1H. THE BACKGROUND OF CLASS ACTION AND ANTITRUST LAWS............ 203
A. Class Actions are Powerful Tools that Benefit Society .............. 203
1. The Typicality and Commonality Requirements of Rule 23(a)
Tend to Merge      .........................   ....... 206
2. Rule 23(b)(2) Provides Injunctive or Declarative Relief to a
Homogenous Group of Individuals............    ..... 207
B. Class Actions Provide Antitrust Practitioners with a Powerful and
Efficient Tool.     .............................. ..... 210
C. The Supreme Court did not Certify the Class and Held that the
Wal-Mart Employees Failed to Establish the Requirements of Rule
23  ................................................ 212
1. The Class Failed to Establish Rule 23(a): It Lacked
Commonality Because the Employees had too Many
Individualized Questions  ................... ..... 214
2. The Class Failed to Satisfy Rule 23(b)(2) by Seeking Monetary
Relief    ....................................... 215
3. The Court Opened the Door for Lower Courts to Apply the
Daubert Rule..................................... 215
III. WHILE WAL-MART V. DUKES WILL INCREASE THE DIFFICULTY FOR A
CLASS TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATION, DUKES WILL MINIMALLY IMPACT
ANTITRUST CLASS ACTIONS     ............................... 216
A. Dukes Increases the Difficulty for Plaintiffs to Meet Rule
23(a)(2)'s Commonality Requirement ..................... 217
1. Dukes's Changes to the Commonality Requirement Will Not
Impact Antitrust Class Action Litigation because that
Litigation Rarely Turns on this Requirement ....... ..... 218
B. Dukes will Prevent Future Classes from Seeking both Monetary
and Injunctive Relief .....................     ............ 222
1. Dukes is Unlikely to Impact Antitrust Class Action
Litigation because Plaintiffs Rarely File Cases Pursuant to
Rule 23(b)(2)     ...........................  ...... 223
C. After Dukes, Courts will Scrutinize Expert Testimony .............. 225
1. Antitrust Class Action Litigation Relies Strongly on Expert
Testimony and Dukes Will Have an Impact in this Area...... 227
IV. ULTIMATELY, DUE TO THE NATURE OF ANTITRUST CLASS ACTIONS,
DUKES WILL ONLY IMPACT EXPERT TESTIMONY ........      ........ 228

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most