About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

34 Bond L. Rev. 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/bondlr34 and id is 1 raw text is: 







The Intersection of the Rule in Yerkey v

Jones and Contemporary Anti-

Discrimination Law in Australia - Can the

'Special Wives' Equity Survive?

KENNETH  YIN* AND MOSTAFA  MAHMUD NASER*


                                Abstract

       The High Courtin  Yerkey v Jones considered the enforceability
       of a guarantee provided by  a married woman   to secure her
       husband's debts. Dixon J said that although the relationship of
       husband and  wife did not give rise to a presumption of undue
       influence, the law had never been divested completely of 'the
       equitable presumption of an invalidating tendency' Dixon J's
       formulation was essentially adopted by the majority justices in
       Garcia v  National Australia Bank  and their judgment  thus
       represents the definitive endorsement of Dixon J's view Kirby
       Jon the other hand rejected 'the stereotype underlying Yerkey,
       which   he  described  as  evidence   of  an   'unprincipled
       discriminatory category'

       This article advances the argument that the majority's view of
       wives was stereotypical and accordingly would be inconsistent
       with the principles of contemporary sex discrimination laws
       which  prohibit discrimination based on  the assumption  of
       stereotypical views. This inconsistency will be explored by first
       discussing the propositions that underpinned the Yerkey and
       Garcia, and by comparing  them  with the treatment of those
       propositions in contemporaiy discrimination law









   Lecturer in Law, School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University. Formerly a solicitor
   until 1996 then a Barrister at Francis Burt Chambers. This article is dedicated to his very dear
   friend and colleague Elisabeth Lambert for introducing him to the rich tapestry of human
   rights law and inspiring him to pursue his interest in it.
   Lecturer in Law, School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University.
   We thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their many
   insightful comments and suggestions.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most