About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

36 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 1 (2015)

handle is hein.journals/berkjemp36 and id is 1 raw text is: Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law VOLUME 36 2015 NUMBER 1 ARTICLES Causation in Context Leora F. Eisenstadtt Causation in Context examines and critiques the Supreme Court's January 2014 decision in Burrage v. United States and the false equivalency drawn between factual causation standards in criminal law and employment discrimination law. In nearly all of its opinions on factual causation, the Court has looked to the ordinary meaning of statutory language, cautioning, in some form or another, that text may not be divorced from its context. Nonetheless, the Court continues to do just that, applying linguistic meaning across statutes without consideration ofits context, the type of statute in which the language is found, the policy goals at issue in its creation, and the overall functioning of causation in the relevant area of law. That was certainly the case in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the Court's recent factual causation employment cases. In Burrage, however, the Court takes this acontextual approach one step further by drawing an equivalency between criminal law and employment discrimination that is not only illogical but also potentially detrimental to future employment discrimination jurisprudence. This article draws on the existing scholarly critique of but-for causation in disparate treatment cases and argues that the Burrage Court's false equivalency between criminal law and employment discrimination law is as damaging as the Court's decisions in Gross and Nassar. Causation in Context examines the history of but-for causation in employment cases, explores the four major problems with the Burrage approach, and details the ways in which it is likely to negatively impact discrimination doctrine into the future. T Assistant Professor, Department of Legal Studies, Fox School of Business, Temple University; B.A., Yale University; J.D., New York University School of Law, L.L.M, Temple University Beasley School of Law. This Article benefited greatly from the 2014 Annual Academy of Legal Studies in Business Conference and ALSB reviewers. I would also like to thank Sandra F. Sperino in particular for her insightful comments and helpful conversations and Jane Baron and David Hoffman for their advice and mentoring.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most