About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

4 Ave Maria Int'l L.J. 1 (2015)

handle is hein.journals/avemintj4 and id is 1 raw text is: 




2015        AVE MARIA  INTERNATIONAL  LAW  JOURNAL       SPRING
                          ISSN 2375-2173




            THE SAN JOSE ARTICLES AND AN
         INTERNATIONAL RIGHT TO ABORTION

                        William L. SaundersT


                          INTRODUCTION

    Abortion advocates are on a mission to establish an international
right to abortion using soft norms under customary international law.
Their ultimate goal  is to weave  throughout  the various sources  of
customary   international law, language   implying  an  international
consensus that abortion is a necessary component of fundamental health
that must  be provided by  States to their citizens. If national bodies,
including courts, accept the notion that an international customary law
right to abortion exists, those bodies could impose it upon their citizens.
    To understand the dilemma, let us imagine the reversal of Roe v. Wade'
from the perspective of a person who has faithfully participated in the
March  for Life2 in Washington D.C. each year in protest of Roe. In one day
the U.S. Supreme  Court announces  it is reversing Roe and holds that a
right to abortion cannot be derived from the words of the Constitution.' It
does not take much  imagination to understand the joy this news would
bring to the faithful marcher, whose decades-long protest has apparently
borne fruit. But then, imagine the devastation the marcher would feel if
the Supreme  Court were to announce that, despite the reversal of Roe, a
right to abortion nonetheless exists in the United States because abortion
has been established as a human right under customary international law.
Such  an established right is the prize for which abortion advocates are
working-a   failsafe backstop for the day when the Supreme Court finally
reverses Roe.



Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel, Americans United for Life, Washington D.C.

I Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
2 See MARCH FOR LIFE, http://marchforlife.org.
Neither under a liberty or privacy interpretation, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most