About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

54 Ateneo L.J. 1 (2009-2010)

handle is hein.journals/ateno54 and id is 1 raw text is: The Mindanao Question: Constitutional Dialogue in Southern Philippines A. Edsel C. F. Tupaz* I. OVERVIEW ........................... ...................... I II. CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY..................................................... 2 III. THE ENFORCEMENT MODEL ...................................................... 7 IV. DIALOGICAL CONSTITUTIONALISM AND PRIN CIPLED AM BIGUITY ............................................................... IO A. Liberal Legality as a Fighting Faith B. Dialogical Democracy in Constitutional Form V . C A SE ST U D IES................................................................................30 A. South Africa B. South Africa and Northern Ireland C. South Africa, Northern Ireland, and Southern Philippines V I. C O N CLU SIO N .............................................................................5 7 I. OVERVIEW In this Article, I analyze strikingly parallel constructive negotiations and constitutional dialogue between Northern Ireland and South Africa in post- conflict reconstruction. In particular, I examine their political milieu and gauge what might be termed as transformative and dialogical * '08 LL.M., Harvard Law School; '03 J.D., with honors, Ateneo de Manila University School of Law. He once clerked for Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide, Jr. & Justice Ma. Alicia Austria-Martinez, Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines. The author was previously an Editor (2002-2003) and Staff (2001-2002) of the Ateneo Law Journal. His past works published in the Journal include: Constitutional Courts in Divided Societies: A Call for Scholarship on International Intervention in Constitutional Law and Politics, 53 ATENEo L.J. 324 (2008); Deliberative Democracy and Weak Courts: Constitutional Design in Nascent Democracies, 53 ATENEO L.J. 343 (2008); Sel-Determination as Defined Under the United Nations Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Secession or Autonomy?, 51 ATENEO L.J. 1039 (2007); Ruiz v. Court of Appeals: A Moral Hazard, 49 ATENEo L.J. 982 (2004); A Synthesis of the Colloquium on Indigenous Peoples, 47 ATENEo L.J. 775 (2002); The People Power and the Supreme Court in Estrada v. Arroyo, 47 ATENEo L.J. 8 (2002). This Article is a modified version of one of the author's works, A Dialogical-Republican Revival: Respect-worthy Constitutionalism in Post-Conflict Northern Ireland, South Africa, and Southern Philippines, 54 WAYNE L. REV. 1295 (2009). The author thanks Professors Frank Michelman, Mark Tushnet, Noah Weisbord, Chris Taggart, Ori Aronson, and Rosalind Dixon for their invaluable support for this Article. Cite as 54 ATENEo L.J. I (2009). Digitized from Best Copy Available

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most