About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

63 Ariz. L. Rev. 1 (2021)

handle is hein.journals/arz63 and id is 1 raw text is: CONSTRUCTING SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL COURTROOMS Ion Meyn* Federal reform transformed civil and criminal litigation in the early 1940s. The new civil rules sought to achieve adversarial balance as it afforded litigants, virtually all white, with powerful discovery tools. In contrast, the new criminal rules denied defendants, often litigants of color, any power to discover information. Instead, the new criminal rules emboldened the prosecutor to bring charges and control what facts to withhold from or share with the defendant. An essential feature of the criminal template's design to insert a white gatekeeper with unreviewable discretion who could distribute benefits and burdens across racial lines was an established Jim Crow strategy to maintain the racial order. This Article explores the significance of drafting the rules of procedure within the social and political forces of Jim Crow. In this assessment, the Article finds that the most influential of the criminal template's authors embraced Jim Crow norms: one lectured that Black people were predisposed to criminality; one authored a state supreme court decision that opined whites, but not Black people, had respect for the law; and one issued judicial opinions lauded by segregationists. This Article contends that federal reform, deeply influenced by the entrenched norms of the time, wrote race into procedure and contributed to the construction of separate and unequal courtrooms. The Article finally observes that our state and federal courtrooms still operate pursuant to key features of this Jim Crow blueprint. * Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. The Author is grateful for the insights of David Ball, Jeannine Bell, Bennett Capers, Devon Carbado, Gabriel Chin, Brooke Coleman, Frank Rudy Cooper, Anuj Desai, Carissa Hessick, Alexandra Huneeus, Osamudia James, Stephen Kantrowitz, Joseph Kennedy, Nancy King, Jennifer Laurin, Jamelia Morgan, Justin Murray, Lea Johnston, Heinz Klug, Alexandra Natapoff, Ngozi Okidegbe, Jocelyn Simonson, David Schwartz, and Mitra Sharafi. The Author is grateful to the law faculties at Emory and Minnesota for feedback during Faculty Colloquiums. Rachel Dykema, Farah Famouri, and Anya Gersoff provided invaluable assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most