About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

92 N.C. L. Rev. Addendum 1 (2013-2014)

handle is hein.journals/addendum5 and id is 1 raw text is: CITE AS 92 N.C. L. REV. ADDENDUM 1

THE SUPREME COURT, CAFA, AND PARENS
PATRIAE ACTIONS: WILL IT BE PRINCIPLES OR
BIASES?*
DONALD G. GIFFORD AND WILLIAM L. REYNOLDS*
INTRODUCTION.............. 1
I.     THE BURGEONING IMPORTANCE OF PARENSPATRIAE STANDING..... 3
II.    HOOD V. AU OPTRONIcs: THE CASE BELOW...              ................ 4
III.   COMPETING APPROACHES TO STATUTORY INTERPRETATION........... 7
A.   Textualism                              ....................7.... ............7
B.   The Purposive Approach.      ........................... 9
IV.    INTERPRETING THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT .               .............. 9
A.   Textual Analysis       .......................         .......... 9
1. Class Action.    ................................ 9
2. Mass Action.........................                    10
B. Implicit Purposivism Prevails (Surprisingly) in Hood .......... 13
C. Examining CAFA's Purpose and Legislative History............ 13
CONCLUSION                               .................................................... 15
INTRODUCTION
The Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Mississippi ex rel.
Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.' provides a unique opportunity to test whether
the individual Justices will follow their previously articulated principles of
statutory interpretation or instead will ignore these principles in order to
reach a result reflecting their respective pro-business or pro-consumer
biases. The issue before the Court in Hood is whether the defendant
manufacturers can remove a parens patriae action2 alleging price-fixing
* 0 2013 Donald G. Gifford and William L. Reynolds.
** Edward M. Robertson Research Professor of Law, University of Maryland Carey School
of Law. J.D., Harvard Law School, 1976. We thank Jane Kalinina and Laura Koman for their
research and editorial assistance.
*** Jacob A. France Professor of Judicial Process, University of Maryland Carey School of
Law. J.D., Harvard Law School, 1970.
1. 701 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. granted, 133 S. Ct. 2736 (2013).
2. Parenspatriae, a Latin phrase, is roughly translated as parent of the country. Alfred L.
Snapp & Son v. Puerto Rico, 458 U.S. 592, 600 (1982). It now describes a type of standing given
to a state government to sue to protect the health and welfare of its citizens. Id. at 607; see also
infra notes 11-12 and accompanying text.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most