HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.jfk/jfkarch48069 and id is 1 raw text is: 104.10331.10316
SECRET
September 11, 1995
WORKING PAPER
Notes from meeting w/ ARRB staff Sept. 11, 1995
ARRB Attendees: Marwell, Gunn, Mary + one
CIA Attendees : Barry, Ellie
Issue: Inconsistency between Mexico City Chrono item
#132 and ARRB document #31
Gunn proposed that the Agency release the information in
document 31 that was released by mistake in the Mexicip-City
Chrono. Otherwise, the staff would have to take the
document back to the ARRB for reconsideration which they'
felt would undercut the credibility of the CIA and the
staff. The Board will not uphold a postponement in a
specific document if that information is released by mistake
in another copy of the same document.
Ellie's response - because the information deals with Mex.
ZP:, she will have to take their proposal to a higher
level. [response needed by 16 September]
They also requested a new highlighted version of the
Mexico City Chrono which reflects all information released
to NARA in the multiple copies of the Chrono and in the
documents referenced in the Chrono.
Issue: The three documents of concern.
IEllie reviewed t e issues--the fact that he
Thad denied in court his ;affiliation with th~e CIA, etc.*--
noted that since the document would not be included in the
etermination list would the Board be willing to reconsider.
Marwell said that we could make an addition pitch to the
Board to reconsider, but he did not think i have any
eff n their decision.
PROENZA - Ellie explained that out goal here was to protect
the asset not the method and that the deletions could be
reduced to those words that could result in the
identification of the agent.
Marwell said that the Board may reconsider based on the need
to protect a source.
Mary ask who was the asset? Was it LIRING?
Ellie said she did not know (it could have been some AM
source.
SECRET](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.jfk/jfkarch48069&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)