HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.jfk/jfkarch19275 and id is 1 raw text is: 104 0O331-10375
7 August 1995
Notes for the Record I
Subject: Meeting with ARRB Staff 4 August, 1995
Attendees: Jeremy Gunn
Mary McAuliffe
BoB Skwirot
Barry Harrelson
1. First part of meeting focused on action by the ARRB
at the 2/3 August meeting. Gunn emphasize that the feedback
he was giving me was unofficial and preliminary; that the
staff had not complete its review of board actions. Action
by the ARRB was taken on approximately 39 documents; a mix
of release in fulls, release with redactions and
tabled. These actions included:
A. TNVOY released when context did not indicate j
activities (at least 8 documents); I was given an
advance list. References to LIENVOY in= context and
the words and were postponed to the
year 2017. Gunn stressed that the ARRB discussed each
LIENVOY individually -- no blanket release or denial
[note: 7 of the 8 document were ones that HRG and DO
reviewers had concluded did not indicated(
B. True names -- replaced with alias/pseudo when known
subject to re-review in December; one exception where the
name.was illegible.
C. (Lfiiprotected for 10 years;, however would like
more information re current risk. Gunn said the Board was
having a problem with ]due to amount of information in
public domain (Newman's book). They appeared to accept the
need not to release new information on (LI-9 or his
relationship with the CIA at this time, but there is a
debate re postponing information that has been released in
other documents. Gunn suggested a statement from qI-9
would be useful evidence.
D. They also ask for additional information re
continuing to protect (LIT.IL-7 and (L
2. The remaining Mexico City documents will be on
the agenda for the ARRB meeting schuedule for 27/28 August.
They plan to complete the Chrono and Lopez Report at that
meeting.](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.jfk/jfkarch19275&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)