About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

104-10330-10020 JFK Assassination Records Archives 1 (9/11/1995)

handle is hein.jfk/jfkarch19074 and id is 1 raw text is: 104-10330-10020


                                       SECRET


                                                    September 11, 1995
                                                    WORKING PAPER

           Notes  from meeting w/ ARRB staff Sept. 11, 1995


           ARRB Attendees:  Marwell, Gunn, Mary + one
           CIA Attendees  : Barry, El1ie


           Issue:     Inconsistency between Mexico City Chrono item
                      #132 and ARRB document #31


            Gunn proposed that the Agency release the information in
            document 31 that was released by mistake in the Mexico City
            Chrono.  Otherwise, the staff would have to take the
            document back to the ARRB for reconsideration which they
            felt would undercut the credibility of the CIA and the
            staff.  The Board will not uphold a postponement in a
            specific document if that information is released by mistake
            in another copy of the same document.

            Ellies  response - because the information deals with Mex.
                   I she will have to take their proposal to a higher
            level. [response needed by 16 September]

            They also requested a new highlighted version of the
            Mexico City Chrono which reflects all information released
            to NARA in the multiple copies of the Chrono and in the
            documents referenced in the Chrono.

            Issue:    The three documents of concern.

            GIBSON.- Ellie reviewed the Gibson issues- the  ac  th   e,4
                                                              etc.  I
            noted thap, since the document would not le included in the
            determinatfion list would the Board be willing to reconsider.

            Marwell said that we could make an addition pitch to the
            Board'to reconsider, but he did not think it would have any
            effect on their decision.

            PROENZA - Ellie explained that out goal here was to protect
            the asset not the method and that the deletions could be
            reduced to those words that could result in the
            identification of the agent..

            Marwell said that the Board may reconsider based on the need
            to protect a source.

            Mary ask who was the asset? Was it LIRING?
            Ellie said she did not know (it could have been some AM
            source.


SECRET

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most