About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

2022-02 Reports of Cases before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance 1 (2022)

handle is hein.intyb/rcbjcofi0426 and id is 1 raw text is: Reports of Cases OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL RICHARD DE LA TOUR delivered on 28 October 20211 Case C-275/20 European Commission V Council of the European Union (Action for annulment - Decision (EU) 2020/470 - Extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part - Procedural legal basis - Article 218(7) TFEU - Applicable procedure and voting rule) I. Introduction 1. By its application, the European Commission seeks the annulment of Council Decision (EU) 2020/470 of 25 March 2020 as regards the extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part.2 2. That Protocol established a framework within which the Parties cooperate for facilitating exchanges regarding cultural activities, goods and services, including inter alia in the audiovisual sector, and for improving the conditions governing such exchanges. In the Protocol, the Parties agreed to grant audiovisual co-productions between producers from the European Union and from the Republic of Korea entitlement to benefit from their respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content. That entitlement is subject to renewal every three years. 3. At EU level, the Commission was authorised by the Council of the European Union to terminate the entitlement at issue before the expiry of each period or to propose its renewal. The present case will lead the Court to clarify whether that authorisation falls within the scope of Article 218(7) TFEU and, if so, whether the conditions governing its exercise are consistent with that provision. 1 Original language: French. 2 OJ 2020 L 101, p. 1, 'the contested decision'. ECLI:EU:C:2021:8821 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most