About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2017-2 Reports of Cases before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance 1 (2017)

handle is hein.intyb/rcbjcofi0388 and id is 1 raw text is: 





ZCVRLA


Reports of Cases


                                      Case  C-392/15

                                  European  Commission
                                             V
                                         Hungary


(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment
   Notaries - Nationality requirement - Article 51 TFEU - Connection with the exercise of
                                      official authority)


Summary  -  Judgment  of the Court (First Chamber), 1 February 2017


1.  Freedom  of establishment  -  Exceptions  -  Activities connected with the exercise of official
    authority -  Concept  -  Activities constituting a direct and specific participation in the exercise
    of official authority

    (Art. 51, first para., TFEU)

2.  Freedom  of establishment  -  Exceptions  -  Activities connected with the exercise of official
    authority  - Notarial activities - Not included  -  Nationality requirement for access to the
    notarial profession - Not permissible

    (Arts 49 TFEU and  51, first para., TFEU)

1. See the text of the decision.

                                                                            (see paras 105-108)

2. By imposing a nationality requirement for access to the notarial profession, a Member State fails to
fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU where the activities carried out by notaries in the legal
order of that Member  State have no  connection with the exercise of official authority within the
meaning  of the first paragraph of Article 51 TFEU.

First, as regards the activity of issuing orders for payment, it must be held that a notary's powers in
that regard, which are based entirely on an alignment of the wishes of the creditor and debtor and
leave intact the prerogatives of the courts should the parties fail to reach an agreement as to whether
the debt is outstanding, do not have any connection with the exercise of official authority.

Secondly, in inheritance matters, since the tasks entrusted to notaries are carried out on a consensual
basis and have no impact on the power  of the courts in the absence of an agreement between the
parties, nor may those tasks, consequently, be regarded as having, in themselves, a direct and specific
connection with the exercise of official authority.

Thirdly, as regards the depositing of monies with a notary, that activity does not involve the exercise of
decision-making powers, since the role of notaries is limited to verifying compliance with legal
requirements.


ECLJ:EU:C:2017:731


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most