About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2012-11 E.C.R. 1 (2012)

handle is hein.intyb/rcbjcofi0341 and id is 1 raw text is: 





  ZReports of Cases




                                       Case C-551/10 P

                                  1tditions Odile Jacob SAS
                                              V
                                    European Commission


    (Appeal - Concentrations of undertakings in the book publishing market - Regulation (EEC)
                No 4064/89 - Nominee holding agreement - Ineffective grounds)


             Summary - judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 6 November 2012

1.  Competition - Concentrations - Examination by the Commission - Merger carried out before
    notification - Effects - Whether open to the Commission to declare the merger compatible with
    the common market

    (Council Regulation No 4064/89, Arts 7(5), (14(1)(a) and 2)

2.  Acts of the institutions - Statement of reasons - Obligation - Scope - Decision applying the
    rules relating to concentrations between undertakings - Decision permitting a concentration

    (Council Regulation No 4064/89, Art. 8(2))

3.  Competition -   Concentrations -  Examination by the Commission -    Commitments by the
    undertakings concerned to render the notified transaction compatible with the common market -
    Commitment to sell assets -  Criteria for selection of the purchaser -  Whether open to the
    Commission to select the purchaser most likely to ensure perfect competition on the market -
    Not open - Sale of assets to a financial buyer- Lawfulness - Conditions

    (Council Regulation No 4064/89, Arts 2(1)(a), 2 and 3; Commission Notice 2001/C 68/03, para. 49)

4.  Appeal - Grounds - Mistaken assessment of the facts - Inadmissibility - Review by the Court of
    the assessment of the facts and evidence - Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has
    been distorted

    (Art. 256 TFEL; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58)

1. In proceedings brought against a Commission decision declaring a concentration compatible with
the common market, the fact that the concentration was carried out before its notification to the
Commission has no effect on the legality of that decision. Although that fact may entail the penalties
prescribed by Regulation No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, in
accordance with Article 14(1)(a) or (2) thereof, it cannot lead to the annulment of the Commission
decision, since it has no relevance to the compatibility of the concentration with the common market.
Article 7(5) of Regulation No 4064/89 provides that the validity of any transaction which is carried out
before its notification and before it has been declared compatible with the common market is to be
dependent on the decision taken by the Commission on conclusion of the examination of the
notification or of the in-depth examination procedure.


ECL:EU:C:2012:681

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most