About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

52-53 ICJ Newsl. 1 (1993)

handle is hein.icj/icjnews0052 and id is 1 raw text is: No 5 -53                                    p, 1 199

ICJ Condemns Deportation of Palestinians

T he I.C.J. wrote to the UN Security
Council expressing its alarm over
the Israeli decision to deport 417 Pales-
tinians from the West Bank and Gaza
on 18 December 1992. While deploring
the 12 December incident of kidnap-
ping and eventual killing of an Israeli
soldier by Hamas, the ICJ asserted
that the Israeli response to such an act
should be consistent with the provi-
sions of international law.
On 16 December 1992, the Israeli
Cabinet took the unprecedented step
of ordering the summary deportation
of 417 Palestinians from the Occupied
Territories. The Cabinet also amended
the Israeli legal provisions permitting
deportation. The text of the amend-
ments has not been published. The Is-
raeli Radio announced, however, that
the amendments effectively abolished
the existing mechanisms for the legal
review of deportation orders.
Israel refused to release the names
of the deportees. It announced how-
ever that they belong to Hamas and al-
Jihad al-Islami organizations. There is
no claim that al-Jihad al-Islami partici-
pated in the killing of the Israeli sol-
dier.
Upon the announcement of the de-
portation orders, Israeli and Palestin-
ian Human Rights activists, including
the ICJ affiliate The Gaza Center for
Rights and Law, petitioned the Israeli
Supreme Court for a restraining order.
The Court granted the stay order and
convened to discuss the appeal. After
15 hours of deliberations, it confirmed
the legitimacy of the deportations. The
ICJ deeply regretted such a ruling
which clearly violated the principles of
international law.
Israel bases its deportation orders
on article 108 of the 1945 Defence
(Emergency) Regulations enacted dur-
ing the British Mandate over Palestine.
The British government asserts that
these Regulations were revoked by the
British Mandatory authorities on the
eve of their May 1948 departure from

Palestine. Despite these assertions, Is-
rael argues that they remain as an in-
tegral part of the applicable law in the
West Bank and Gaza.
International law subjects the Is-
raeli occupation of the West Bank and
Gaza in 1969 to the provisions of the
1949 IV Geneva Convention Relative to
the Protection of Civilians in Times of
War. According to this Convention, de-
portation is not only illegal, but also

Nabil Ismail (AFP)
constitutes a Grave Breach of the Con-
vention. Grave Breaches of the Geneva
Convention are War Crimes. The provi-
sions of this Convention therefore su-
persede the 1945 Defence (Emergency)
Regulations which were enacted be-
fore its coming into force.
The ICJ noted that the current Is-
raeli wave of deportations take place
Continued on Page 2

Jurists Call for an International Penal Court

D uring the discussion on the hu-
man rights situation in the former
Yugoslavia, the International Commis-
sion of Jurists (ICJ) intervened before
the United Nations Commission on Hu-
man Rights stressing the need to es-
tablish an International Penal Court.
Recognizing the dire necessity to
prosecute those responsible for mass
and flagrant human rights violations in
the former Yugoslavia, the ICJ wel-
comed Security Council Resolution
780, which created an impartial panel
of experts to investigate the crimes be-
ing committed in the conflict. The
Commission on Human Rights, the ICJ

said, should adopt a resolution articu-
lating the practical steps to be taken to
establish this ad hoc panel and to ex-
tend its mandate to include not only
the responsibility to investigate, but
also the power to prosecute.
The ICJ noted, however, that this
ad hoc panel, while relevant in the
case of the former Yugoslavia, does not
answer the global demand for an Inter-
national Penal Court. The ICJ asserted
that since international human rights
law was created to protect all *equally,
it must be respected and defended uni-
Continued on Page 2

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most