About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Progressive Codification of International Law 1 (1930)

handle is hein.hoil/progcil0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


[Distributed to the Members of                               Official No: A. 82. 1930. V.
the League, the Assembly and
         the Council.j
                                                          Geneva,  October 2nd, 1930.

                              LEAGUE OF NATIONS


PROGRESSIVE CODIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.



                   REPORT BY THE FIRST COMMITTEE.


                             Rapporteur: M. GIANNINT  (Italy).


    The  items on the agenda of the First Committee were so important that the Committee
has had  very little time to examine carefully the questions connected with the progressive
codification of international law, and, in particular, the suggestions which, as a result of experience
gained at the first Codification Conference, that Conference embodied in its Final Act.
    Moreover, several proposals have been submitted to the Committee, either in connection
with special questions-for instance, the proposal of M. Ferrara, the delegate for Cuba-or
regarding the further action to be taken in the matter of codification, and particularly the procedure,
to be followed for the preparation of new conferences (draft resolution of the Irish delegation,
draft resolution of the British, French, German, Greek and Italian delegations, with amendments
proposed by  the Belgian, Italian, Norwegian and Swedish delegations).
    As  these proposals related to the substance of the question, the Committee thought that
there was insufficient time to examine them adequately, and finally agreed on the following
proposal, which it submits to the Assembly for approval:

                                     Draft Resolution.
          The Assembly has taken note of the work of the Conference which was held at The
    Hague  in March and April 1930, as a result of the initiative taken by the Assembly by its
    resolution of September 22nd, 1924, regarding the progressive codification of international
    law,
          It reaffirms the great interest taken by the League of Nations in the development of
    international law, inter alia, by codification, and considers it to be one of the most important
    tasks of the League to further such development by all the means in its power.
          The recommendations  made  by the Conference contain suggestions of the highest
    value, and must be taken into account in examining what would be the best methods for
    continuing the work which has been begun,
          The Assembly accordingly decides to adjourn the question to its next session, and
    requests the Council, in the meanwhile, to invite the Members of the League of Nations and
    the non-Member  States to communicate to it, if they so desire, their observations on these
    suggestions, in order that these observations may be taken into consideration by the Assembly.

                                         S*    *
    Since the proposals submitted by the various delegations represented different points of
view, and since they certainly merit discussion (possibly at the next Assembly), they have been
set out in the form of an annex to the present report.

    The  draft resolution submitted to the Assembly calls for some explanation. We take note
of the work of the Hague Conference and reaffirm the interest taken by the League of Nations
in the development of international law, inter alia, by codification, considering such development
to be one of the most important tasks that the League has to accomplish.
    As  the Minutes of the Hague Conference have not yet been printed, and as they must be
studied before an idea can be formed of the result of the work and the action to be taken thereon;
and as, moreover, the Conference made recommendations  containing suggestions as to the best
method  to be followed for future conferences, the Committee feels that, although it is obliged
to propose the adjournment of this question until the next Assembly, no time should be lost. The
interval between the two Assemblies might, indeed, be usefully employed by requesting the Council
to notify those States which took part in the Conference to communicate to it, if they so desire,
their observations on the above-mentioned suggestions, in order that these observations may be
taken into consideration by the next Assembly.

S. d. N. 2.o05 (F.) 1.625 (A.) 1o/30. Imp. Kundig. Series of League of Nations Publications
                                                               V.  LEGAL
                                                             1930.   V.  24.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most