About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-422040 Jan 04, 2024 1 (2024-01-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaoprm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



  -      A    O ` U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release


Matter of:   Jacobs Technology, Inc.

File:        B-422040

Date:     January 4,   2024

Brian P. Waagner, Esq., Steven A. Neeley, Esq., and Geroge E. Stewart III, Esq.,
Husch  Blackwell LLP, for the protester.
Michael F. Mason, Esq., Taylor A. Hillman, Esq., Christine A. Reynolds, Esq., and Stacy
M. Hedeka,  Esq., Hogan Lovells US LLP, for InDyne, Inc., the intervenor.
Julie A. Glascott, Esq., James Kim, Esq., and Andrew J. Smith, Esq., Department of the
Army, for the agency.
Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency unreasonably evaluated protester's technical proposal is denied
where evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation.

2. Protest that agency failed to hold meaningful discussions with protester is denied
where evaluation notices led protester into the areas of its proposal with which the
agency had  concerns.

3. In making best-value tradeoff determination, the agency is not required to quantify
benefits of selecting higher-priced, higher technically rated proposal.
DECISION

Jacobs Technology,  Inc., of Tullahoma, Tennessee, protests the award of a contract to
InDyne, Inc., of Lexington Park, Maryland, under request for proposals (RFP)
No. W91 RUS-22-R-0082,   issued by the Department of the Army for support services for
the Electronic Proving Ground (EPG) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. Jacobs alleges that
the Army unreasonably evaluated its proposal and failed to hold meaningful
discussions. Jacobs also challenges the agency's best-value tradeoff decision.


We  deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most