About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-422006,B-422006.2 Dec 20, 2023 1 (2023-12-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaopqz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



  G     A .  y  U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release


Matter of:   L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

File:     B-422006; B-422006.2

Date:     December 20, 2023

Andrew  E. Shipley, Esq., Philip E. Beshara, Esq., Elizabeth J. D'Aunno, Esq., Douglas
W. Gates, Esq., and Jarrod R. Carman, Esq., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
LLP, for the protester.
Marcia G. Madsen,  Esq., Luke Levasseur, Esq., Evan C. Williams, Esq., and Jason C.
Coffey, Esq., Mayer Brown LLP, for the intervenor.
Adam  Supple, Esq., Marla Harrington, Esq., and Kristin Pollard Kiel, Esq., National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, for the agency.
Charmaine  A. Stevenson, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of proposals and selection decision is
denied where the record shows that the evaluation and selection decision were
reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.

2. Protest challenging the cost realism analysis of the awardee's proposal is denied
where the record shows the agency's computation of upward cost adjustments was
reasonably based and adequately documented,  and where the agency reasonably
concluded that an impending corporate transaction would not materially impact the cost
of performance or the awardee's ability to perform the contract.

3. Protest alleging that the timing of agency's hiring decision created an unmitigable
appearance  of impropriety is denied where the facts do not establish any impropriety
requiring disqualification of the awardee, or a conflict of interest that impaired the source
selection authority's ability to render an impartial decision.
DECISION

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (L3Harris), of Fort Wayne, Indiana, protests the award of a
contract to Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation (Ball), of Boulder, Colorado,
under request for proposals (RFP) No. 80GSFC22R0055,  issued by the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space  Flight Center (GSFC)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most