About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-421254.9,B-421254.10 Dec 04, 2023 1 (2023-12-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaopoi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States




Decision


Matter of:  Steiner Construction Company, Inc.

File:     B-421254.9;   B-421254.10

Date:     December 4, 2023

Jacob W. Scott, Esq. and Karl F. Dix, Jr., Esq., Smith, Currie & Hancock, LLP, for the
protester.
James  A. Tucker, Esq., W. Jay DeVecchio, Esq., Alissandra D. Young, Esq., Victoria D.
Angle, Esq., and Michaela E. Thornton, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for the
intervenor.
Gabriel D. Soll, Esq., Department of Homeland Security, for the agency.
Charmaine  A. Stevenson, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging an agency's decision to continue with performance of a contract
where the Small Business Administration (SBA) Area Office's initial determination that
the awardee was an eligible small business for purposes of the procurement was
subsequently vacated is dismissed for failure to state a valid basis of protest where the
protest relies on an inapplicable Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) section and fails
to demonstrate that the agency has violated a procurement statute or regulation.
DECISION

Steiner Construction Company, Inc., a small business of Bayou La Batre, Alabama,
protests the continued performance of a contract awarded to Birdon America, Inc. under
solicitation No. 70ZO2321 RPRT00300, issued as a small business set-aside by the
Department of Homeland  Security, United States Coast Guard (USCG) for the design
and production of 27 vessels for its waterways commerce cutter program. The protester
contends that USCG's decision to permit Birdon to continue performance of the contract
is unreasonable and violates Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requirements to
either terminate the contract or not exercise further contract options.

We  dismiss the protest because it is legally insufficient and fails to state a valid basis of
protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most