About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-421660,B-421660.2 Aug 08, 2023 1 (2023-08-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaopgi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release


Matter of:   Science Applications International Corporation

File:     B-421660; B-421660.2

Date:     August 8,   2023

James  J. McCullough, Esq., Michael J. Anstett, Esq., Alexander B. Ginsberg, Esq.,
Frank V. DiNicola, Esq., and Katherine L. St. Romain, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver
& Jacobson  LLP, for the protester.
Seth H. Locke, Esq., Brenna D. Duncan, Esq., Joshuah R. Turner, Esq., and
Jedidiah Blake, Esq., Perkins Coie LLP, for the intervenor.
Adam  Supple, Esq., Grant Arnold, Esq., and Hema G. Sresty, Esq., National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, for the agency.
Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Agency  reasonably determined that awardee's proposal was substantially superior to
protester's proposal under the most important evaluation factor; offered a cost/price that
was less than one percent higher than protester's cost/price; and reflected the best
value for the agency.
DECISION

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), of Reston, Virginia, protests the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) award of a contract to Space
Network Solutions, LLC dba Space & Technology Solutions (STS), pursuant to request
for proposals (RFP) No. 80GSFC21 R0046, to provide engineering support services.
SAIC, the incumbent contractor, protests the agency's determination that STS's
proposal was substantially superior to SAIC's under the most important evaluation
factor, mission suitability, and offered the best value to the agency. Protest at 16-51.1

We  deny the protest.



1 Page number  citations in this decision refer to the Adobe PDF page numbers in the
documents  submitted.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most