About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-421880 Sep 27, 2023 1 (2023-09-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaopfa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States




Decision


Matter of:   Superior Optical Labs, Inc.

File:        B-421880

Date:     September 27, 2023

John E. McCarthy, Jr., Esq., Zachary H. Schroeder, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, and
Elizabeth Haws Connally, Esq., Connally Law, PLLC, for the protester.
David S. Gallacher, Esq., and Lauren V.T. Irish, Esq., Sheppard Mullin Richter &
Hampton  LLP, for the intervenor.
Natica Chapman  Neely, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
Charmaine  A. Stevenson, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest is dismissed where the matter involved is the subject of litigation before a court
of competent jurisdiction.
DECISION

Superior Optical Labs, Inc., a small business of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, protests the
terms of solicitation No. 36C24723Q0934, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) for the manufacture of prescription eyeglasses and provision of optician services
for the VA's Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 7. The protester contends that
the agency's justification and approval in support of the limited competition of a short-
term or bridge contract is unlawful and unreasonable. The protester further contends
that the solicitation is materially flawed because it contains numerous technical
requirements that are unduly burdensome but does not include any technical evaluation
criteria, and unreasonably fails to require that the agency consider unbalanced pricing
even though award will be based on price alone.

We  dismiss the protest because the matter involved is currently pending before a court
of competent jurisdiction.

We  will not decide a protest where the matter involved is the subject of litigation before
a court of competent jurisdiction. 4 C.F.R. § 21.11(b); Oahu Tree Experts, B-282247,
Mar. 31, 1999, 99-1 CPD ¶ 69. Even where the issues before the court are not the
same  as those raised in our Office by a protester or are brought by a party other than

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most