About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-421359,B-421359.2 Apr 06, 2023 1 (2023-04-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaoolw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G ' U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Matter of: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation File: B-421359; B-421359.2 Date: April 6, 2023 Michael F. Mason, Esq., Stacy Hadeka, Esq., Christine Reynolds, Esq., Thomas Hunt, Esq., Taylor Hillman, Esq., Lauren Olmsted, Esq., and Maya Desai, Esq., Hogan Lovells US LLP; Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Jon W. Burd, Esq., Scott Felder, Esq., Cara L. Sizemore, Esq., and Lisa Rechden, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP; David Rikkers, Esq., Rikkers Technology Law PLLC; and Heather A. Bloom, Esq., Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the protester. Jason A. Carey, Esq., Kayleigh M. Scalzo, Esq., J. Hunter Bennett, Esq., Andrew R. Guy, Esq., Chanda L. Brown, Esq., Anna M. Menzel, Esq., Jennifer K. Bentley, Esq., Emma C. Merrill-Grubb, Esq., and Daniel H. Raddenbach, Esq., Covington & Burling LLP; and John G. Sams, Esq., Bell Textron Inc., for Bell Textron Inc., the intervenor. Jonathan A. Hardage, Esq., Patrick Nelson, Esq., Stacy Wilhite, Esq., Alexa Bryan, Esq., Jeremy Tillman, Esq., and Wade L. Brown, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. April Y. Shields, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Admission of counsel and consultant to a protective order was appropriate over objections, where the record showed that the applicants did not participate in competitive decisionmaking and that there was not otherwise an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure of protected information. 2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's proposal as technically unacceptable for failing to provide the level of detail required by the solicitation is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable procurement law and regulation. 3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation and the acceptability of the awardee's proposal for allegedly departing from administrative requirements is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable procurement law and regulation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most