About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-420602,B-420602.2,B-420602.3,B-420602.4,B-420602.5,B-420602.6,B-420602.7,B-420602.8,B-420602.9,B-420602.10 Jun 23, 2022 1 (2022-06-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaonhu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has L been approved for public release. Matter of: DynCorp International, LLC; PAE Aviation and Technical Services, LLC; M1 Support Services, LP File: B-420602; B-420602.2; B-420602.3; B-420602.4; B-420602.5; B-420602.6; B-420602.7; B-420602.8; B-420602.9; B-420602.10 Date: June 23, 2022 Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Jon W. Burd, Esq., Sarah B. Hansen, Esq., and W. Benjamin Phillips, III, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for DynCorp International, LLC; Anuj Vohra, Esq., Robert J. Sneckenberg, Esq., James G. Peyster, Esq., Tyler S. Brown, Esq., and Allison Skager, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC; Aron C. Beezley, Esq., Lisa A. Markman, Esq., and Gabrielle A. Sprio, Esq., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, for M1 Support Services, LP, the protesters. J. Alex Ward, Esq., W. Jay DeVecchio, Esq., James A. Tucker, Esq., Alissandra D. Young, Esq., and Markus G. Speidel, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for Vertex Aerospace, LLC, the intervenor. Christopher B. Erly, Esq., Morgan E. Gierhart, Esq., and Aldo Perez, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency. David A. Edelstein, Esq., and Alexander O. Levine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protests challenging agency's cost and technical evaluation are denied where protesters have not demonstrated that the agency's evaluation was unreasonable or inconsistent with the terms of the solicitation. 2. Protest that the agency failed to consider a conflict of interest based on the awardee's hiring of a former government employee is denied where the contracting officer reasonably concluded that the individual in question did not have access to competitively useful information. 3. Protest that the agency did not consider the impact of a corporate transaction involving the awardee is denied where the record demonstrates that the agency was unaware of the transaction and the transaction was not imminent and essentially certain prior to award.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most