About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419860,B-419860.2 Aug 31, 2021 1 (2021-08-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaomfw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1Oo U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                        Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                   of the United States
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                            a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
been approved for public release.
Matter of:  Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
File:      B-419860; B-419860.2
Date:     August 31, 2021
Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Cara L. Lasley, Esq., Lindy C. Bathurst, Esq., and Nicole E.
Giles, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester.
J. Scott Hommer, III, Esq., Rebecca E. Pearson, Esq., Christopher G. Griesedieck,
Esq., Krista A. Nunez, Esq., Taylor A. Hillman, Esq., and Caleb E. McCallum, Esq.,
Venable LLP, for Noblis, Inc., the intervenor.
Joseph V. Fratarcangeli, Esq., Defense Threat Reduction Agency, for the agency.
Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of proposals under the most important
factor, technical, is denied where the agency's evaluation, including consideration of the
value associated with competing proposals, was reasonable and consistent with the
terms of the solicitation.
2. Protest asserting that, as the incumbent contractor, protester was entitled to a past
performance rating that was superior to a non-incumbent offeror's rating is dismissed for
failing to state a valid basis for protest.
3. Protest that agency was required to upwardly adjust the awardee's proposed
transition costs for evaluation purposes is denied where the agency's evaluation of
awardee's proposed costs was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation
requirements.
DECISION
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH), of McLean, Virginia, protests the Defense Threat
Reduction Agency's (DTRA) issuance of a task order to Noblis, Inc., of Reston, Virginia,
pursuant to task order request for proposals (TORP) No. HDTRA1 -20-R-0001, to
provide support for DTRA's cooperative threat reduction (CTR) program. BAH generally
asserts that, as the incumbent contractor, its proposal was entitled to higher technical
and past performance ratings than Noblis's proposal, and that the agency failed to
properly evaluate Noblis's proposed costs for the transition period.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most