About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419487.2,B-419487.3 Aug 06, 2021 1 (2021-08-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaomce0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1Oo U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                       Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                 of the United States
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                           a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
been approved for public release.
Matter of: MAXIMUS Federal Services, Inc.
File:     B-419487.2; B-419487.3
Date:     August 6, 2021
Brian A. Darst, Esq., Odin Feldman Pittleman PC, for the protester.
Alexander B. Ginsberg, Esq., and Meghan D. Doherty, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP, for Cognosante, LLC, the intervenor.
Dorothy M. Guy, Esq., Brandon Dell'Aglio, Esq., and Jonathan Meyer, Esq., Social
Security Administration, for the agency.
Michael P. Grogan, Esq., Evan D. Wesser, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protest alleging that the agency unreasonably evaluated proposals is denied where
the record shows the evaluation and award decision were reasonable and in
accordance with the stated evaluation criteria, and, to the extent there were any errors,
the protester cannot establish any reasonable possibility of competitive prejudice.
2. Protest alleging that the agency did not conduct meaningful discussions regarding
the protester's key personnel is denied where the agency was under no obligation to
raise its concerns with the protester because the identified concerns were not evaluated
as a significant weakness, deficiency, or adverse past performance information that the
protester had not previously had an opportunity to address.
3. Protest challenging the agency's cost realism evaluation is denied where the record
shows that the upward adjustments to protester's proposed costs were reasonable.
DECISION
Maximus Federal Services, Inc., of Falls Church, Virginia, protests the award of a
contract to Cognosante, LLC, under request for proposals (RFP) No. 283213-21-R-
00000001, issued by the Social Security Administration (SSA), for program
management services for the agency's Ticket-to-Work program. The protester
contends that the agency's evaluation of proposals was unreasonable and inconsistent
with the stated evaluation criteria.

We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most