About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-419565,B-419565.2,B-419565.3,B-419565.4,B-419568,B-419568.2,B-419568.3,B-419568.4,B-419595 May 07, 2021 1 (2021-05-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaomao0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1Oo U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has V V been approved for public release. Matter of: Sigmatech, Inc. File: B-419565; B-419565.2; B-419565.3; B-419565.4; B-419568; B-419568.2; B-419568.3; B-419568.4; B-419595 Date: May 7, 2021 Dennis J. Callahan, Esq., Jeffery M. Chiow, Esq., Deborah N. Rodin, Esq., and Emily A. Wieser, Esq., Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC, for the protester. Roderic G. Steakley, Esq., and Benjamin R. Little, Esq., Sirote & Permutt, P.C., for Torch Technologies, Inc., the intervenor. Jonathan A. Hardage, Esq., Deborah Muldoon, Esq., Vincent Ongjoco, Esq., and Wade L. Brown, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that the agency applied an undisclosed preference that the award of task orders under three separate solicitations be made to a single offeror is denied where the record does not support the protester's allegation. 2. Protest that the agency's award of multiple task orders to a single offeror constituted improper bundling of small business requirements is dismissed as untimely where the solicitations did not prohibit award of all orders to the same offeror. 3. Protest that the agency improperly failed to consider the effect of the award of multiple task orders on the awardee's technical approach is denied where the solicitations did not require the agency to consider this matter and the protester does not show that resources in the awardee's proposal were unavailable as a result of the multiple awards. 4. Protest of the evaluation of technical proposals is denied where the evaluations were reasonable, equal, and consistent with the terms of the solicitations. 5. Protest of the agency's decision to conduct discussions with the awardee after eliminating protester's proposal from the competitive range, thereby establishing a competitive range of one, is denied where the agency's decision to limit the competitive range was reasonable and where the agency did not treat the offerors unequally.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most