About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418461.13,B-418461.20 Feb 24, 2021 1 (2021-02-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaoliw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                   1Oo U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
                                A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Veteran Technology Partners III LLC

File:     B-418461.13; B-418461.20

Date:     February   24, 2021

Elizabeth Jochum, Esq., Nora K. Brent, Esq., and Zachary D. Prince, Esq., Smith
Pachter McWhorter  PLC, for the protester.
Frank V. DiNicola, Esq., Desiree A. DiCorcia, Esq., Tara Nash, Esq., and Ronald J.
Bakay, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
Kasia Dourney, Esq., and Evan C. Williams, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that the agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions during step one of
the evaluation is denied where the solicitation provided that offerors could not correct or
revise specific aspect of proposals, and where the agency was under no obligation to
engage  in clarifications regarding that aspect of the proposal.

2. Protest challenging the evaluation of the protester's technical proposal is denied
where there is no basis to conclude that the agency's evaluation was unreasonable.

3. Protest alleging that the agency failed to adequately consider non-technical factors in
the competitive range determination is denied where the record shows the competitive
range determination considered non-technical factors and was otherwise reasonable.
DECISION

Veteran Technology Partners III LLC (VTP), a service-disabled veteran-owned small
business (SDVOSB)   of Alton, Illinois, protests the elimination of its proposal from the
competition by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) under request for proposals
(RFP) No. 36C10B19R0046 for   professional and information technology (IT) services.1
The protester argues that the agency unreasonably eliminated its proposal.
Specifically, VTP contends that the VA failed to conduct meaningful discussions during

1 VTP is a mentor-protege SDVOSB  joint venture between SDVOSB protege
Competitive Range Solutions, LLC and mentor Red River Technology LLC. Protest,
Exh. H at 1-2.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most