About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-310548 1 (2007-12-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaukc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Cornell Companies, Inc.

          File:        B-310548

          Date:        December 3, 2007

          Ruth E. Ganister, Esq., Rosenthal and Ganister, for the protester.
          Alex D. Tomaszczuk, Esq., Orest J. Jowyk, Esq., and Daniel S. Herzfeld, Esq.,
          Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, for Dismas Charities, Inc., an intervenor.
          Tracey L. Printer, Esq., Department of Justice, for the agency.
          Eric M. Ransom, and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preperation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Assessment of a weakness against the protester's proposal was not improper
          where the considerations on which the assessment was based were encompassed by
          the evaluation criteria.

          2. Assessed weakness was not required to be raised in discussions where the
          weakness was not considered significant, and did not prevent the proposal from
          meeting the solicitation requirements or having a reasonable chance of award.
          DECISION

          Cornell Companies, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Dismas Charities, Inc. by
          the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. 200-0953-SC, for Residential Reentry Center (RRC) services in El Paso County,
          Texas. Cornell asserts that the agency failed to follow the evaluation criteria set
          forth in the solicitation, failed to hold meaningful discussions, and made a flawed
          source selection decision (SSD).

          We deny the protest.

          The BOP issued the RFP on December 21, 2006, requesting proposals to provide RRC
          services for male and female Federal offenders. The RFP contemplated award of a
          fixed-price requirements-type contract with a base period of 2 years and 3 option
          years. Award was to be made to the offeror whose proposal was determined to
          represent the best value to the government under three evaluation factors: past
          performance, technical/management, and price. RFP § M.5. The RFP stated that

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most