About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-310436 1 (2007-12-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaujx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                 Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    D OCUMEN-T FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Recon Optical, Inc.

          File:        B-310436; B-310436.2

          Date:        December 27, 2007

          David J. Taylor, Esq., and William J. Spriggs, Esq., Spriggs & Hollingsworth, and
          Bradford E. Biegon, Esq., and Katherine A. Allen, Esq., for the protester.
          Richard H. Streeter, Esq., and Scott E. Pickens, Esq., Barnes & Thornburg LLP, for
          Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS, an intervenor.
          Daniel Pantzer, Esq., and Frank DiNicola, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg., Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency's decision not to select protester's proposal for award is unobjectionable,
          where the proposal was reasonably assessed the lowest possible ratings (red or
          high risk) under the three most important evaluation factors and was higher in
          price than the other proposals, which were technically superior.
          DECISION

          Recon Optical, Inc. (ROI) protests the award of a contract to Kongsberg Defence &
          Aerospace AS by the Department of the Army under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. W15QKN-06-R-1409, for common remotely operated weapon stations (CROWS).
          ROI challenges the evaluation of its and Kongsberg's proposals under each of the
          evaluation factors.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The CROWS is a multi-vehicle weapon mounting and control system that attaches to
          the top of an armored vehicle and allows the gunner to remain inside the vehicle
          while firing the weapon. This remote weapon station is to be capable of mounting
          various small to medium caliber machine guns (the MK19 grenade machine gun, M2
          HB machine gun, M240B machine gun, or M249 squad automatic weapon) and is to
          include, at a minimum, the weapon mount above the roof with sensors, fire control

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most