About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-310357 1 (2007-12-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaujv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office       DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Essan Metallix Corporation

          File:        B-310357

          Date:        December 7, 2007

          Kevin M. Cox, Esq., and Nancy M. Camardo, Esq., Camardo Law Firm, P.C., for the
          protester.
          Jason P. Matechak, Esq., Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq., and Steven D. Tibbets, Esq., Reed
          Smith LLP, for Maher, Ltd., an intervenor.
          Major Walter R. Dukes, and Leslie A. Nepper, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          Eric M. Ransom and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preperation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          An agency may properly exclude a defaulted contractor from the competition for the
          reprocurement of the work remaining under the terminated contract.
          DECISION

          Essan Metallix Corporation protests the Department of the Army's failure to solicit it
          in the agency's reprocurement of British stainless steel tubes under solicitation No.
          W52H09-07-T-5765.

          We deny the protest.

          The protester here was the awardee of the previous contract for the requirement,
          awarded on August 31, 2005. The subject reprocurement began after the protester's
          contract was terminated for default' on January 16, 2007. Agency Report (AR),

          1 The protester's terminated contract was a contract for commercial items and thus
          included the termination for cause clause specified by Federal Acquisition
          Regulation (FAR) part 12 for commercial item acquisitions (FAR § 52.212-4), rather
          than the standard termination for default clause (FAR § 52.249-8). Although Essan
          was terminated for cause under FAR part 12, Essan's termination resulted from its
          failure to comply with the delivery schedule in its contract, and Essan's termination
          is described, variously, as for cause or for default in the record. For consistency,
          we will refer to Essan's termination as for default throughout this decision.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most